The Role of Green Investment, Climate Change Mitigation Strategies, and Corporate Social Responsibility in Sustainable Infrastructure Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/sdi.v1i01.1461Keywords:
Sustainable Infrastructure Development, Green Investment, Climate Change Mitigation, Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainability StrategiesAbstract
Sustainable infrastructure development is essential for addressing global challenges such as climate change, environmental degradation, and economic disparities. This study investigates the roles of green investment, climate change mitigation strategies, and corporate social responsibility (CSR) in promoting sustainable infrastructure development. Using a quantitative approach, data were collected from 115 respondents involved in infrastructure planning and implementation, utilizing a structured questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale. Statistical analysis using SPSS version 26 revealed that all three variables significantly and positively influence sustainable infrastructure development, with climate change mitigation strategies having the strongest impact. The regression model explains 72% of the variance in sustainable infrastructure development, highlighting the interconnectedness of financial, environmental, and social dimensions. These findings underscore the importance of integrated strategies, providing actionable insights for policymakers, investors, and corporate leaders to drive sustainability in infrastructure projects.
References
F. Taghizadeh-Hesary and N. Yoshino, “Sustainable solutions for green financing and investment in renewable energy projects,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 788, 2020.
M. Saleh and L. Hashemian, “Addressing climate change resilience in pavements: major vulnerability issues and adaptation measures,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 2410, 2022.
J. Corfee-Morlot et al., “Towards a green investment policy framework: The case of low-carbon, climate-resilient infrastructure,” 2012.
A. Baietti, Green infrastructure finance: leading initiatives and research. World Bank Publications, 2012.
R. P. F. Ferrarez et al., “Sustainability indicators to assess infrastructure projects: Sector disclosure to interlock with the global reporting initiative,” Eng. J., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 43–61, 2020.
World Bank Group, “A world Bank Group Flagship Report,” p. 103, 2016, [Online]. Available: http://www.doingbusiness.org/~/media/GIAWB/Doing Business/Documents/Annual-Reports/English/DB16-Full-Report.pdf
G. De Roo and D. Miller, Compact cities and sustainable urban development: A critical assessment of policies and plans from an international perspective. Routledge, 2019.
Y. Nakao, A. Ishino, K. Kokubu, and H. Okada, “Exploring visual communication in corporate sustainability reporting: Using image recognition with deep learning,” Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag., 2024.
P. OECD, Infant mortality. oecd Paris, 2020.
N. Stern, “A time for action on climate change and a time for change in economics,” Econ. J., vol. 132, no. 644, pp. 1259–1289, 2022.
IPCC, Climate Change 2022 - Mitigation of Climate Change - Full Report, no. 1. 2022.
A. Nicolaides, “Corporate social responsibility and ethical business conduct on the road to sustainability: A stakeholder approach,” Int. J. Dev. Sustain., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 200–215, 2021.
A. Kumar, J. Gupta, and N. Das, “Revisiting the influence of corporate sustainability practices on corporate financial performance: An evidence from the global energy sector,” Bus. Strateg. Environ., vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 3231–3253, 2022.
M. P. Johnson, T. S. Rötzel, and B. Frank, “Beyond conventional corporate responses to climate change towards deep decarbonization: a systematic literature review,” Manag. Rev. Q., vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 921–954, 2023.
