Mapping the Landscape of Environmental Taxation Studies with a Bibliometric Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wsaf.v2i02.1057Keywords:
Environmental Taxation, Economic Impacts, Bibliometric Analysis, VOSviewerAbstract
This study presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of environmental taxation research, aiming to map the thematic landscape, identify research trends, and highlight potential areas for future investigation. Utilizing VOSviewer, the analysis encompasses 980 papers published between 1983 and 2024, revealing key themes such as economic impacts, sustainable development, emission control, and policy optimization. Temporal trends indicate a growing emphasis on integrating innovation and sustainability into environmental tax policies. Potential research areas identified include optimizing tax rates, exploring behavioral responses, and addressing equity considerations. The co-authorship network analysis highlights influential authors and collaborative clusters, suggesting opportunities for enhancing interdisciplinary research. This study provides valuable insights for policymakers, academics, and practitioners aiming to design effective environmental tax policies that address global environmental challenges.
References
M. Rao, L. Vasa, Y. Xu, and P. Chen, “Spatial and Heterogeneity Analysis of Environmental Taxes’ Impact on China’s Green Economy Development: A Sustainable Development Perspective,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 12, p. 9332, 2023.
M. F. Mia, M. Islam, and N. Rahman, “Green taxation changes government revenue and its applicability in Bangladesh,” Available SSRN 4362065, 2023.
T. Vasilyeva, Y. Samusevych, V. Babenko, S. Bestuzheva, S. Bondarenko, and I. Nesterenko, “Environmental taxation: Role in promotion of the pro-environmental behaviour,” 2023.
M. Stojanović, J. Gligorijević, G. Stojanović, and S. Becić, “Analysis of the influence of environmental taxation on environmental innovations,” Ekon. i praksa, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 101–119, 2023.
G. L. Thanasas, A. Slimistinou, G. Kontogeorga, and S. Lampropoulos, “ENVIRONMENTAL TAXATION AS A BOOST MECHANISM FOR EUROPEAN UNION GREEN GROWTH: THE GREEK RESPONSE.,” Risk Gov. Control Financ. Mark. Institutions, vol. 13, no. 1, 2023.
A. D. As’ ad, A. Junaid, N. Nurfadila, and M. Muslim, “How carbon tax affects the economy and environment: Point of view a corporate taxpayer,” Adv. Tax. Res., vol. 1, no. 2, 2023.
E. V Pilevina, Y. A. Lukina, and S. N. Chernaya, “Environmental Taxation: Experience of Foreign Countries,” in Current Problems of the Global Environmental Economy Under the Conditions of Climate Change and the Perspectives of Sustainable Development, Springer, 2023, pp. 441–450.
J. Xie et al., “A bibliometric analysis of forest gap research during 1980–2021,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 1994, 2023.
J. M. B. Oliveira-Junior et al., “A bibliometric analysis of the global research in Odonata: Trends and gaps,” Diversity, vol. 14, no. 12, p. 1074, 2022.
A. K. Singh, Y. Zhang, and Anu, “Understanding the evolution of environment, social and governance research: novel implications from bibliometric and network analysis,” Eval. Rev., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 350–386, 2023.
I. Nasim, “Role of Green Finance for Sustainable Environment So Far: A Bibliometric Analysis and Policy Framework,” Pakistan J. Humanit. Soc. Sci., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 882–895, 2023.
D. Fullerton, A. Leicester, and S. Smith, “Environmental taxes,” National bureau of economic research, 2008.
L. Anggrayni, A. I. A. Fatriansyah, and S. Tubagus, “The Environmental Accounting Evolution: A Literature Review and Future Directions,” Kunuz J. Islam. Bank. Financ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 120–133, 2022.
T. D. Crocker, A. Randall, W. J. Baumol, and W. E. Oates, “The Theory of Environmental Policy,” Land Econ., vol. 52, no. 2, p. 255, 1976, doi: 10.2307/3145303.
D. Fullerton and G. E. Metcalf, “Environmental controls, scarcity rents, and pre-existing distortions,” J. Public Econ., vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 249–267, 2001.
S. E. Baranzini et al., “Transcriptional analysis of multiple sclerosis brain lesions reveals a complex pattern of cytokine expression,” J. Immunol., vol. 165, no. 11, pp. 6576–6582, 2000.
L. H. Goulder and I. W. H. Parry, “Instrument choice in environmental policy,” Rev. Environ. Econ. policy, 2008.
R. Das et al., “Go for a walk and arrive at the answer: Reasoning over paths in knowledge bases using reinforcement learning,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv1711.05851, 2017.
S. Kallbekken and H. Sælen, “Public acceptance for environmental taxes: Self-interest, environmental and distributional concerns,” Energy Policy, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 2966–2973, 2011.
N. S. A. Hassan, M. R. Palil, R. Ramli, and R. Maelah, “Enhancing Tax Compliance in Malaysia: Does Tax Learning and Education Matter?,” Int. Bus. Educ. J., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 18–29, 2022.
R. Schöb, “The double-dividend hypothesis of environmental taxes: a survey,” Int. Yearb. Environ. Resour. Econ., vol. 2006, pp. 223–279, 2005.
L. H. Goulder, “Environmental taxation and the double dividend: a reader’s guide,” Int. tax public Financ., vol. 2, pp. 157–183, 1995.
A. L. Bovenberg and R. A. De Mooij, “Environmental levies and distortionary taxation,” Am. Econ. Rev., vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 1085–1089, 1994.
A. L. Bovenberg and L. H. Goulder, “Optimal environmental taxation in the presence of other taxes: general-equilibrium analyses,” Am. Econ. Rev., vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 985–1000, 1996.
D. Krass, T. Nedorezov, and A. Ovchinnikov, “Environmental taxes and the choice of green technology,” Prod. Oper. Manag., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1035–1055, 2013.
I. W. H. Parry, “Pollution taxes and revenue recycling,” J. Environ. Econ. Manage., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. S64–S77, 1995.
B. Salanie, The economics of taxation. MIT press, 2011.
L. H. Goulder, “Effects of carbon taxes in an economy with prior tax distortions: an intertemporal general equilibrium analysis,” J. Environ. Econ. Manage., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 271–297, 1995.
J. R. Markusen, E. R. Morey, and N. Olewiler, “Competition in regional environmental policies when plant locations are endogenous,” J. Public Econ., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 55–77, 1995.
R. Hashmi and K. Alam, “Dynamic relationship among environmental regulation, innovation, CO2 emissions, population, and economic growth in OECD countries: A panel investigation,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 231, pp. 1100–1109, 2019.
D. Fullerton and T. C. Kinnaman, “Household responses to pricing garbage by the bag,” in Environmental Taxation in Practice, Routledge, 2017, pp. 481–494.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Loso Judijanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Facebook 
Instagram 
Twitter 
Youtube 
+62 821 1557 5700 
info@westscience-press.com 