Building Public Trust: The Role of AI in Preventing and Exposing Fraudulent Financial Reporting in the Public Sector – a Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wsaf.v2i03.1322Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Financial Report Fraud, Public Sector, Public TrustAbstract
Undetected financial reporting fraud can undermine public trust in the government. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a potential solution to detect and uncover financial reporting fraud more quickly and accurately. AI offers real-time big data analysis capabilities, which can help prevent misuse of public funds. The purpose of this study is to systematically review the existing literature on the role of AI in preventing and uncovering financial reporting fraud in the public sector, and to identify ethical and regulatory challenges in its implementation. The method used in this study is a Systematic Literature Review (SLR), where relevant literature is identified, screened based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, analyzed, and interpreted to provide a comprehensive overview of the topic. The results show that AI has great potential in improving the efficiency of fraud detection and strengthening public trust in government financial management. However, this study also highlights key challenges in the implementation of AI, including ethical, privacy, and bias issues, as well as the need for regulations that support the responsible use of AI.
References
R. Septiriana, “Application of Artificial Intelligence in the prevention of fraud in financial statements,” J. Ekon., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 2278–2290, 2024, doi: 10.54209/ekonomi.v13i01.
S. S. Taher, S. Y. Ameen, and J. A. Ahmed, “Advanced Fraud Detection in Blockchain Transactions: An Ensemble Learning and Explainable AI Approach,” Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 12822–12830, 2024, doi: 10.48084/etasr.6641.
B. Mytnyk, O. Tkachyk, N. Shakhovska, S. Fedushko, and Y. Syerov, “Application of Artificial Intelligence for Fraudulent Banking Operations Recognition,” Big Data Cogn. Comput., vol. 7, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.3390/bdcc7020093.
F. A. Almaqtari, “The Role of IT Governance in the Integration of AI in Accounting and Auditing Operations,” Economies, vol. 12, no. 8, 2024, doi: 10.3390/economies12080199.
Beatrice Oyinkansola Adelakun, Ebere Ruth Onwubuariri, Gbenga Adeniyi Adeniran, and Afari Ntiakoh, “Enhancing fraud detection in accounting through AI: Techniques and case studies,” Financ. Account. Res. J., vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 978–999, 2024, doi: 10.51594/farj.v6i6.1232.
S. M. N. Nobel et al., “Unmasking Banking Fraud: Unleashing the Power of Machine Learning and Explainable AI (XAI) on Imbalanced Data,” Inf., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1–22, 2024, doi: 10.3390/info15060298.
H. Han, R. K. Shiwakoti, R. Jarvis, C. Mordi, and D. Botchie, “Accounting and auditing with blockchain technology and Artificial Intelligence: A literature review,” Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst., vol. 48, no. November 2022, p. 100598, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.accinf.2022.100598.
M. El Hajj and J. Hammoud, “Unveiling the Influence of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning on Financial Markets: A Comprehensive Analysis of AI Applications in Trading, Risk Management, and Financial Operations,” J. Risk Financ. Manag., vol. 16, no. 10, 2023, doi: 10.3390/jrfm16100434.
B. Murphy, O. Feeney, P. Rosati, and T. Lynn, “Exploring accounting and AI using topic modelling,” Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst., vol. 55, no. July 2023, p. 100709, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.accinf.2024.100709.
R. Silva, H. Inácio, and R. P. Marques, “Blockchain implications for auditing: a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis,” Int. J. Digit. Account. Res., vol. 22, no. November, pp. 163–192, 2022, doi: 10.4192/1577-8517-v22_6.
K. Kapadiya et al., “Blockchain and AI-Empowered Healthcare Insurance Fraud Detection: An Analysis, Architecture, and Future Prospects,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, no. June, pp. 79606–79627, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3194569.
G. Puthukulam, A. Ravikumar, R. V. K. Sharma, and K. M. Meesaala, “Auditors’ perception on the impact of Artificial Intelligence on professional skepticism and judgment in oman,” Univers. J. Account. Financ., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1184–1190, 2021, doi: 10.13189/ujaf.2021.090527.
H. Gu, M. Schreyer, K. Moffitt, and M. Vasarhelyi, “Artificial Intelligence co-piloted auditing,” Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst., vol. 54, no. July, p. 100698, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.accinf.2024.100698.
S. S. Cao, W. Jiang, L. (Gillian) Lei, and Q. (Clara) Zhou, “Applied AI for finance and accounting: Alternative data and opportunities,” Pacific Basin Financ. J., vol. 84, no. February, p. 102307, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2024.102307.
N. Aoki, “An experimental study of public trust in AI chatbots in the public sector,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 37, no. 4, p. 101490, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101490.
D. Ressi, R. Romanello, C. Piazza, and S. Rossi, “AI-enhanced blockchain technology: A review of advancements and opportunities,” J. Netw. Comput. Appl., vol. 225, no. May 2023, p. 103858, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2024.103858.
A. Y. A. Bani Ahmad, “Ethical implications of Artificial Intelligence in accounting: A framework for responsible ai adoption in multinational corporations in Jordan,” Int. J. Data Netw. Sci., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 401–414, 2024, doi: 10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.9.014.
M. Sweet and R. Moynihan, Improving Population Health: The Uses of Systematic Reviews, no. Cdc. 2007.
D. Denyer and D. Tranfield, “Producing a Systematic Review,” SAGE Handb. Organ. Res. Methods, pp. 671–689, 2009.
D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, and D. G. Altman, “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.,” PLoS Med., vol. 6, no. 7, p. e1000097, Jul. 2009, doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
A. P. Siddaway, A. M. Wood, and L. V. Hedges, “How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses,” Annu. Rev. Psychol., vol. 70, pp. 747–770, 2019, doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803.
S. N. Yang, L. C. Chang, and F. J. Chang, “AI-based design of urban stormwater detention facilities accounting for carryover storage,” J. Hydrol., vol. 575, no. June, pp. 1111–1122, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.009.
M. Goto, “Accepting the future as ever-changing: Professionals’ sensemaking about Artificial Intelligence,” J. Prof. Organ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 77–99, 2022, doi: 10.1093/jpo/joab022.
P. R. Prux, F. da S. Momo, and C. Melati, “Opportunities and challenges of using blockchain technology in government accounting in brazil,” BAR - Brazilian Adm. Rev., vol. 18, no. spe, 2021, doi: 10.1590/1807-7692bar2021200109.
Y. Y. Sonbay, “Kritik Terhadap Pemberlakuan Teori Agensi Dalam Pengelolaan Dana Desa Di Suku Boti,” EKUITAS (Jurnal Ekon. dan Keuangan), vol. 6, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.24034/j25485024.y2022.v6.i2.5176.
Z. Zulfajrin, M. W. Abdullah, and Z. Asyifa, “Teori Agensi Islam Sebagai Lokomotif Moral Hazard Dan Adverse Selection,” J. Asy-Syarikah J. Lemb. Keuangan, Ekon. dan Bisnis Islam, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 120–131, 2022, doi: 10.47435/asy-syarikah.v4i2.1047.
X. Ke, J. Y. Lin, C. Fu, and Y. Wang, “Transport infrastructure development and economic growth in China: Recent evidence from dynamic panel system-GMM analysis,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 14, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12145618.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Hasri Ainun Syahfir, Nirwana, Haliah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.