Bibliometric Analysis of Project Management: Exploring the Linkages Between Research and Practice

Authors

  • Loso Judijanto IPOSS Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Rosdiana Arief Tang Universitas Indonesia Timur
  • Said Hamzali Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Himawan Sutanto Universitas Mataram
  • Sulaiman Mansyur Universitas Indonesia Timur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wsbm.v2i04.1503

Keywords:

Project Management, Sustainability, Innovation, Bibliometric Analysis

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of project management research to explore its evolution, thematic trends, and the connections between academic contributions and practical applications. Utilizing data from the Scopus database, the analysis spans publications from 2000 to 2024, identifying key contributors, influential institutions, and global collaborative networks. The findings reveal a dynamic shift in project management research from traditional themes such as risk management and cost control to contemporary focuses on sustainability, innovation, and stakeholder engagement. Prominent authors and institutions were identified, with developed countries leading in research output and collaboration. However, growing contributions from developing nations highlight an emerging inclusivity. The study underscores the interdisciplinary and global nature of project management while identifying a persistent gap between academic research and practical implementation. Recommendations for future research include enhancing collaboration between developed and developing regions, focusing on practical applications of emerging themes, and adopting interdisciplinary approaches. This analysis serves as a foundation for advancing project management research to meet evolving global challenges effectively.

References

E. Ogbeifun, “Performance management as a tool for performance improvement in the management of built facilities,” J. Constr. Proj. Manag. Innov., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1852–1871, 2018.

M. Malik, S. Sarwar, and S. Orr, “Agile practices and performance: Examining the role of psychological empowerment,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 10–20, 2021.

J. Ram, M.-L. Wu, and R. Tagg, “Competitive advantage from ERP projects: Examining the role of key implementation drivers,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 663–675, 2014.

O. Ellegaard and J. A. Wallin, “The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?,” Scientometrics, vol. 105, pp. 1809–1831, 2015.

R. Jaymin-Sanchaniya, D. Thomson, A. Kundzina, and I. Geipele, “EFFECTIVE PROJECT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY: QUANTITATIVE STUDY”.

K. M. Alfawaz and F. M. Aljedani, “Construction of Project Management Using Information System,” Commun. Math. Appl., vol. 13, no. 2, p. 823, 2022.

P. X. W. Zou and B. A. Roslan, “Different perspectives towards using web-based project management systems in construction: large enterprises versus small-and medium-sized enterprises,” Archit. Eng. Des. Manag., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 127–143, 2005.

M. Freeman and P. Beale, “Measuring project success,” Project Management Institute Newtown Square, PA, USA, 1992.

P. Tiwari and B. Suresha, “Moderating role of project innovativeness on project flexibility, project risk, project performance, and business success in financial services,” Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manag., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 179–196, 2021.

A. K. Munns and B. F. Bjeirmi, “The role of project management in achieving project success,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 81–87, 1996.

S. Cicmil, T. Williams, J. Thomas, and D. Hodgson, “Rethinking project management: researching the actuality of projects,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 675–686, 2006.

R. Atkinson, “Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 337–342, 1999.

K. M. A.-S. Al-Harbi, “Application of the AHP in project management,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 19–27, 2001.

M. T. Pich, C. H. Loch, and A. De Meyer, “On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management,” Manage. Sci., vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 1008–1023, 2002.

M. Winter, C. Smith, P. Morris, and S. Cicmil, “Directions for future research in project management: The main findings of a UK government-funded research network,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 638–649, 2006.

W. K. M. Brauers and E. K. Zavadskas, “Project management by MULTIMOORA as an instrument for transition economies,” Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 5–24, 2010.

L. S. Kirsch, “Portfolios of control modes and IS project management,” Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 215–239, 1997.

R. Atkinson, L. Crawford, and S. Ward, “Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 687–698, 2006.

J. Packendorff, “Inquiring into the temporary organization: new directions for project management research,” Scand. J. Manag., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 319–333, 1995.

P. H. Howard et al., “US benefit-cost analysis requires revision,” Science (80-. )., vol. 380, no. 6647, p. 803, 2023.

R. E. Freeman and R. A. Phillips, “Stakeholder theory: A libertarian defense,” Bus. ethics Q., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 331–349, 2002.

J. Elkington, “The triple bottom line,” Environ. Manag. Readings cases, vol. 2, pp. 49–66, 1997.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Judijanto, L., Tang, R. A., Hamzali, S., Sutanto, H., & Mansyur, S. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis of Project Management: Exploring the Linkages Between Research and Practice. West Science Business and Management, 2(04), 1247–1257. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsbm.v2i04.1503