Bibliometric Analysis of Social and Environmental Innovation Research Developments: Trend Identification, Key Concepts, and Collaboration in the Scientific Literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wsbm.v1i04.247Keywords:
Bibliometric Analys, Social, Environmental, Developments, Trend Identification, Key Concepts, Scientific LiteratureAbstract
A thorough bibliometric analysis is conducted in this study to investigate the state of social and environmental innovation research. The present study aims to identify developing trends, significant concepts, and collaboration networks in the subject by a thorough survey of scholarly literature. The analysis offers a comprehensive picture of the changing conversation around social and environmental innovation by incorporating a wide range of publications, such as reports, conference papers, and journal articles.The data shows a notable rise in publications over time pertaining to social and environmental innovation, indicating the field's increasing significance in tackling global issues. Research on social and environmental innovation is by its very nature interdisciplinary, incorporating elements from the social sciences, economics, business, and environmental science. This multidisciplinary approach makes it possible to fully comprehend difficult problems and come up with creative solutions. The existence of collaborative networks among scholars is highlighted by co-authorship network analysis. These networks make it easier to share knowledge, cross-pollinate concepts, and create all-encompassing solutions. The report highlights a number of topics related to emerging research, such as the role of technology in promoting social and environmental innovation, the circular economy and sustainable business models, inclusive entrepreneurship and social innovation, and sustainable supply chains. Researchers, practitioners, and policymakers can all benefit from the understanding this analysis provides. This information can be used by policymakers to guide the creation of laws that encourage environmental and social innovation. Experts are able to recognize new trends and recommended procedures. Scholars are able to pinpoint gaps in existing research and avenues for further investigation.
References
S. Schaltegger and R. L. Burritt, “Sustainability accounting for companies: Catchphrase or decision support for business leaders?,” J. World Bus., 2010.
A. I. Frank, “Entrepreneurship and enterprise skills: A missing element of planning education?,” Planning, Pract. &Research, 2007, doi: 10.1080/02697450701770142.
D. Z. X. Huang, “Environmental, social and governance (ESG) activity and firm performance: A review and consolidation,” Account. Financ., vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 335–360, 2021.
R. G. Klapper and V. A. Farber, “In Alain Gibb’s footsteps: Evaluating alternative approaches to sustainable enterprise education (SEE),” Int. J. Manag. …, 2016.
A. M. Eikenberry and J. D. Kluver, “The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk?,” Public Adm. Rev., 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00355.x.
B. Ozkazanc-Pan and S. Clark Muntean, “Networking towards (in)equality: Women entrepreneurs in technology,” Gender, Work Organ., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 379–400, 2018, doi: 10.1111/gwao.12225.
S. Zivkovic, “Systemic innovation labs: A lab for wicked problems,” Soc. Enterp. J., 2018, doi: 10.1108/SEJ-04-2018-0036.
Y. Iskandar, A. Ardhiyansyah, and U. B. Jaman, “The Effect of Leadership, Supervision, and Work Motivation of the Principal on Teacher Professionalism at SMA Yadika Cicalengka, Bandung Regency,” in International Conference on Education, Humanities, Social Science (ICEHoS 2022), Atlantis Press, 2023, pp. 460–468.
Y. Iskandar, A. Ardhiyansyah, and U. B. Jaman, “The Impact of the Principal’s Leadership Style and the Organizational Culture of the School on Teacher Performance in SMAN 1 Cicalengka in Bandung City, West Java,” in International Conference on Education, Humanities, Social Science (ICEHoS 2022), Atlantis Press, 2023, pp. 453–459.
Y. Iskandar and U. Kaltum, “Exploring Human Resource and Organizational Factors That Influence the Performance of a Social Enterprise.,” Organ. Cult. An Int. J., vol. 22, no. 2, 2022.
F. Sayari, Integration of Startups in Corporations: A qualitative case study on a tech company. diva-portal.org, 2021.
A. E. Plerhoples, “Representing social enterprise,” Clin. L. Rev., 2013.
- Kurniawan, A. Maulana, and Y. Iskandar, “The Effect of Technology Adaptation and Government Financial Support on Sustainable Performance of MSMEs during the COVID-19 Pandemic,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 2177400, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2177400.
D. P. Baron, “Corporate social responsibility and social entrepreneurship,” J. Econ. &Management Strateg., 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2007.00154.x.
P. Burns, Entrepreneurship and small business: start-up, growth and maturity. books.google.com, 2016.
E. Sipahi Dongul and E. Artantaş, “Exploring the link between social work, entrepreneurial leadership, social embeddedness, social entrepreneurship and firm performance: a case of SMES owned by Chinese ethnic community in Turkey,” J. Enterprising Communities People Places Glob. Econ., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 684–707, 2023.
Z. Zhu, Y. Bai, W. Dai, D. Liu, and Y. Hu, “Quality of e-commerce agricultural products and the safety of the ecological environment of the origin based on 5G Internet of Things technology,” Environ. Technol. Innov., 2021.
C. Alvarez, D. Urbano, A. Coduras, and J. Ruiz‐Navarro, “Environmental conditions and entrepreneurial activity: a regional comparison in Spain,” J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 120–140, 2011.
T. B. Khalid and R. Kouhy, “The impact of national contextual factors on corporate social and environmental disclosure (CSED): The perceptions of jordanian stakeholder,” Int. Rev. Manag. Bus. Res., vol. 6, no. 2, 2017.
T. Nurhajati, “Model pengembangan kinerja organisasi melalui kualitas jejaring, kualitas kepercayaan dan inovasi,” Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis. jurnal.unissula.ac.id, 2010.
G. Mulgan, S. Tucker, R. Ali, and B. Sanders, Social Innovation: what it is, why it matters, how it can be accelerated. ictlogy.net, 2007.
F. Hardiansyah, “The Implementation Of Democratic Character Education Through Learning Of Social Science Materials Of Ethical And Cultural Diversity In Elementary School,” J. Innov. Educ. Cult. Res., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 234–241, 2022.
Y. Iskandar, R. S. Wahyuni, R. Rohmat, R. Darwis, and I. Oktaviani, “Filtrasi Air dengan Menggunakan Alat Sederhana untuk Menghasilkan Air Bersih bagi Warga Desa Cikurutug Kecamatan Cireunghas: Flow Filtration using a Simple Tool to Generate Clean Flow for Residents of Cikurutug Village, Cireunghas District,” PengabdianMu J. Ilm. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 74–79, 2022.
Y. Iskandar and U. Kaltum, “Entrepreneurial Competencies, Competitive Advantage, and Social Enterprise Performance: A Literature Review,” in International Conference on Economics, Management and Accounting (ICEMAC 2021), Atlantis Press, 2022, pp. 192–203. doi: 10.2991/aebmr.k.220204.020.
Y. Iskandar, J. Joeliaty, U. Kaltum, and H. Yudomartono, “Key Factors Affecting Social Enterprise Performance: A Literature Review,” J. Dev. Entrep., vol. 28, no. 02, p. 2350015, 2023.
N. D. HERNANIK, S. SUDARMIATIN, and A. HERMAWAN, “MSMES Marketing Strategies Of Batik Malangan In The Covid19 Pandemic,” Int. J. Environ. Sustain. Soc. Sci., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 205–211, 2022.
S. Supriandi, “PENGARUH MODAL SOSIAL, KAPABILITAS FINANSIAL, ORIENTASI KEWIRAUSAHAAN TERHADAP DAYA SAING BISNIS BERKELANJUTAN SERTA IMPLIKASINYA PADA KINERJA UMKM INDUSTRI KULINER DI KOTA SUKABUMI.” Nusa Putra, 2022.
U. B. Jaman, A. H. Nuraeni, B. P. Pitaloka, and K. Z. Gadri, “Juridical Analysis Simplification of Environmental Permits Integrated Through Business Permits Regulated in Law Number 11 of 2020 Concerning Job Creation,” Lib. Law J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 10–22, 2022.
Y. Iskandar, “Entrepreneurial Literacy, Environment, and Intentions of Indonesian Students to Become Social Entrepreneurs,” J. REKOMEN (Riset Ekon. Manajemen), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 9–18, 2023.
S. Olofsson, M. Hoveskog, and F. Halila, “Journey and impact of business model innovation: The case of a social enterprise in the Scandinavian electricity retail market,” J. Clean. Prod., 2018.
G. Macassa, “The Impact of the Inter-Section Smart Specialization, Social Enterprise, and Innovation on Health Promotion and Equity,” Int. J. Sustain. Entrep. Corp. Soc. Responsib., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2022.
K. Semcow and J. K. Morrison, “Lean Startup for social impact: refining the national science foundation’s innovation corps model to spur social science innovation,” Soc. Enterp. J., 2018, doi: 10.1108/SEJ-02-2018-0013.
J. Cameron, “Business as usual or economic innovation?: work, markets and growth in community and social enterprises.[Paper in special issue: Social Enterprise and Social …,” Third Sect. Rev., 2010, doi: 10.3316/ielapa.201100739.
F. Ciulli and A. Kolk, “Incumbents and business model innovation for the sharing economy: Implications for sustainability,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 214, pp. 995–1010, 2019.
V. S. C. Tunn, E. A. Van den Hende, N. M. P. Bocken, and ..., “Digitalised product-service systems: Effects on consumers’ attitudes and experiences,” Resources, conservation …. Elsevier, 2020.
N. M. P. Bocken, S. W. Short, P. Rana, and S. Evans, “A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 65, pp. 42–56, 2014.
A. Turpin and M. L. Shier, “Social entrepreneurial orientation in human service organizations: A scoping review,” Hum. Serv. Organ. Manag. Leadersh. Gov., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 144–168, 2020.
R. T. Esposito, “The social enterprise revolution in corporate law: A primer on emerging corporate entities in Europe and the United States and the case for the benefit corporation,” Wm. &Mary Bus. L. Rev., 2013.
Y. Iskandar, J. Joeliaty, U. Kaltum, and H. Hilmiana, “Bibliometric Analysis on Social Entrepreneurship Specialized Journals,” J. WSEAS Trans. Environ. Dev., pp. 941–951, 2021, doi: 10.37394/232015.2021.17.87.
M. E. Porter and M. R. Kramer, “Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism—And unleash a wave of innovation and growth,” in Managing sustainable business: An executive education case and textbook, Springer, 2018, pp. 323–346.
M. E. Porter and C. van der Linde, “Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship,” J. Econ. Perspect., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 97–118, 1995.
F. W. Geels, “The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms,” Environ. Innov. Soc. transitions, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 24–40, 2011.
K. Rennings, “Redefining innovation—eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics,” Ecol. Econ., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 319–332, 2000.
A. Baregheh, J. Rowley, and S. Sambrook, “Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation,” Manag. Decis., vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1323–1339, 2009.
F. Boons and F. Lüdeke-Freund, “Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 45, pp. 9–19, 2013.
R. Murray, J. Caulier-Grice, and G. Mulgan, The open book of social innovation, vol. 24. Nesta London, 2010.
T. Brown and J. Wyatt, “Design thinking for social innovation,” Dev. Outreach, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 29–43, 2010.
E. Manzini, Design, when everybody designs: An introduction to design for social innovation. MIT press, 2015.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Dyah Palupiningtyas, Moh Gifari sono, Rival Pahrijal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Facebook 
Instagram 
Twitter 
Youtube 
+62 821 1557 5700 
info@westscience-press.com 