Bibliometric Analysis of Entrepreneurship Education: Trends and Research Gaps
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wsjee.v2i04.1382Keywords:
Entrepreneurial Education, Bibliometric Analysis, VOSviewerAbstract
This study presents a bibliometric analysis of entrepreneurship education, examining research trends, publication patterns, and global collaborations from 2000 to 2024. Utilizing data from Scopus, the analysis identifies key thematic clusters within the field, such as foundational pedagogical approaches and the integration of technological advancements in educational practices. The research highlights significant shifts towards experiential and technology-enhanced learning, reflecting the evolving demands of the entrepreneurial landscape. Visualization tools like VOSviewer facilitated the exploration of global collaborative networks, revealing robust interconnections among researchers worldwide with a notable focus in regions such as North America, Europe, and Asia. The analysis also depicts a pronounced increase in research output post-2012, suggesting a burgeoning interest and recognition of entrepreneurship education's critical role in economic development. The findings underscore the importance of adaptability in educational policies and practices to foster effective entrepreneurial training. This study not only maps the intellectual structure of entrepreneurship education but also provides insights into the dynamic nature of research collaborations that shape the field.
References
A. Fayolle, “Personal views on the future of entrepreneurship education,” in A research agenda for entrepreneurship education, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018, pp. 127–138.
T. Volery and S. Mueller, “A conceptual framework for testing the effectiveness of entrepreneurship education programs towards entrepreneurial intention,” Rencontres de st-Gall, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 18–21, 2006.
B. Jones and N. Iredale, “Enterprise education as pedagogy,” Educ. Train., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 7–19, 2010.
O. Ellegaard and J. A. Wallin, “The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?,” Scientometrics, vol. 105, pp. 1809–1831, 2015.
D. F. Kuratko, “The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends, and challenges,” Entrep. theory Pract., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 577–597, 2005.
A. Fayolle and B. Gailly, “From craft to science: Teaching models and learning processes in entrepreneurship education,” J. Eur. Ind. Train., vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 569–593, 2008.
T. Volery, S. Mueller, and B. von Siemens, “Entrepreneur ambidexterity: A study of entrepreneur behaviours and competencies in growth-oriented small and medium-sized enterprises,” Int. Small Bus. J., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 109–129, 2015.
M. Lackéus, “Entrepreneurship in Education,” What, Why, When How, 2015.
E. Samwel Mwasalwiba, “Entrepreneurship education: a review of its objectives, teaching methods, and impact indicators,” Educ. Train., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 20–47, 2010.
L. P. Dana, When Economies Change Paths: Models of Transition in China, the Central Asian Republics, Myanmar & the Nations of Former Indochine Française. World Scientific, 2002.
G. Nabi, F. Liñán, A. Fayolle, N. Krueger, and A. Walmsley, “The impact of entrepreneurship education in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda,” Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 277–299, 2017.
M. Bacigalupo, P. Kampylis, Y. Punie, and G. Van den Brande, “EntreComp: The European Entrepreneurship Competence Framework.” European Commission’s joint research centre. Luxembourg: Publications Office …, 2016.
J. L. Bower and C. M. Christensen, “Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave,” 1995.
F. Liñán, J. C. Rodríguez-Cohard, and J. M. Rueda-Cantuche, “Factors affecting entrepreneurial intention levels: a role for education,” Int. Entrep. Manag. J., vol. 7, pp. 195–218, 2011.
J. C. Sánchez, “The impact of an entrepreneurship education program on entrepreneurial competencies and intention,” J. small Bus. Manag., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 447–465, 2013.
A. Bramwell and D. A. Wolfe, “Universities and regional economic development: The entrepreneurial University of Waterloo,” Res. Policy, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1175–1187, 2008.
W. Nowiński, M. Y. Haddoud, D. Lančarič, D. Egerová, and C. Czeglédi, “The impact of entrepreneurship education, entrepreneurial self-efficacy and gender on entrepreneurial intentions of university students in the Visegrad countries,” Stud. High. Educ., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 361–379, 2019.
J. C. Sánchez, “University training for entrepreneurial competencies: Its impact on intention of venture creation,” Int. Entrep. Manag. J., vol. 7, pp. 239–254, 2011.
C. Jones and J. English, “A contemporary approach to entrepreneurship education,” Educ. Train., vol. 46, no. 8/9, pp. 416–423, 2004.
P. H. Dickson, G. T. Solomon, and K. M. Weaver, “Entrepreneurial selection and success: does education matter?,” J. small Bus. Enterp. Dev., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 239–258, 2008.
M. Laukkanen, “Exploring alternative approaches in high-level entrepreneurship education: creating micromechanisms for endogenous regional growth,” Entrep. Reg. Dev., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 25–47, 2000.
D. Rae, “Universities and enterprise education: responding to the challenges of the new era,” J. small Bus. Enterp. Dev., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 591–606, 2010.
A. I. Vodă and N. Florea, “Impact of personality traits and entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial intentions of business and engineering students,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 1192, 2019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muh. Ihsan Said Ahmad, Ferry Arfiansyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Facebook 
Instagram 
Twitter 
Youtube 
+62 821 1557 5700
westscience.journals@gmail.com