Innovation Performance Measurement in Entrepreneurial Business: A Comparative Study between Start-ups and More Established Enterprises

Authors

  • Eri Mardiani Universitas Nasional
  • A.Ratna Sari Dewi Universitas Hasanuddin
  • Feliks Anggia Binsar Kristian Panjaitan Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Unika Oktaviani Damau Universitas Halu Oleo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wsjee.v1i10.302

Keywords:

Innovation Performance, Entrepreneurial Business, Start-up, Established Business, Bibliometric Analysis

Abstract

Innovation performance measurement is an important aspect of understanding and improving entrepreneurial success, which has implications for economic development, organizational growth, and community welfare. This study uses comprehensive bibliometric analysis to systematically review and analyze the literature on innovation performance measurement in entrepreneurial business. The research covers startups and established companies, aiming to uncover key themes, influential works, and an ever-evolving research landscape in this dynamic field. His methodological approach integrates bibliometric analysis and visualization using VOSviewer, which provides a holistic view of the intellectual structure in the domain. Key findings include the identification of thematic groups, influential authors, and important works, which provide valuable insights for academics, practitioners, and policymakers involved in fostering innovation and entrepreneurship.

References

Y. Iskandar and U. Kaltum, “Entrepreneurial Competencies, Competitive Advantage, and Social Enterprise Performance: A Literature Review,” in International Conference on Economics, Management and Accounting (ICEMAC 2021), Atlantis Press, 2022, pp. 192–203. doi: 10.2991/aebmr.k.220204.020.

Y. Iskandar and U. Kaltum, “The Relationship Between Intellectual Capital and Performance of Social Enterprises: A Literature Review,” 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0141.

G. Rusmayadi, S. Supriandi, and R. Pahrijal, “Trends and Impact of Sustainable Energy Technologies in Mechanical Engineering: A Bibliometric Study,” West Sci. Interdiscip. Stud., vol. 1, no. 09, pp. 831–841, 2023.

T. P. Nugrahanti and A. S. Jahja, “Audit judgment performance: The effect of performance incentives, obedience pressures and ethical perceptions,” J. Environ. Account. Manag., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 225–234, 2018.

T. S. T. Taleb, N. Hashim, and N. Zakaria, “Entrepreneurial Leadership and Entrepreneurial Success: The Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Opportunity Recognition and Innovation Capability,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 7, p. 5776, 2023.

M. Skordoulis et al., “The mediating role of firm strategy in the relationship between green entrepreneurship, green innovation, and competitive advantage: the case of medium and large-sized firms in Greece,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 6, p. 3286, 2022.

E. T. Maziriri, B. Nyagadza, and T. Chuchu, “Innovation conviction, innovation mindset and innovation creed as precursors for the need for achievement and women’s entrepreneurial success in South Africa: entrepreneurial education as a moderator,” Eur. J. Innov. Manag., 2022.

I. Farida and D. Setiawan, “Business Strategies and Competitive Advantage: The Role of Performance and Innovation,” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 8, no. 3, p. 163, 2022.

U. B. Jaman and E. Pertiwi, “Kedaulatan Pajak Negara Indonesia Terhadap Perusahaan Multinasional Digital,” J. Akt. Ris. Akunt. dan Keuang., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 32–42, 2023.

U. B. Jaman, “Perlindungan hukum terhadap usaha mikro kecil dan menengah dihubungkan dengan asas kesetaraan ekonomi dalam upaya mendorong ekonomi kerakyatan.” UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, 2017.

D. O. Suparwata and R. Pomolango, “Arahan pengembangan agribisnis buah naga di pekarangan terintegrasi desa wisata Banuroja,” Agromix, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 85–99, 2019.

L. Ponta, G. Puliga, and R. Manzini, “A measure of innovation performance: the Innovation Patent Index,” Manag. Decis., vol. 59, no. 13, pp. 73–98, 2021.

V. Nappi and K. Kelly, “Key performance indicators and dimensions for the innovation process,” in 25th Innovation and Product Development Management Conference (IPDMC), 2018, pp. 1–20.

K. Asiaei and R. Jusoh, “A multidimensional view of intellectual capital: the impact on organizational performance,” Manag. Decis., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 668–697, 2015.

M. Gotsch and C. Hipp, “Measurement of innovation activities in the knowledge-intensive services industry: a trademark approach,” Serv. Ind. J., vol. 32, no. 13, pp. 2167–2184, 2012.

L. El Bassiti, “Multi-dimensional view of innovation performance from knowledge dynamics to maturity matrix,” Manag. Dyn. Knowl. Econ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 67–85, 2018.

C. Camisón and V. M. Monfort-Mir, “Measuring innovation in tourism from the Schumpeterian and the dynamic-capabilities perspectives,” Tour. Manag., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 776–789, 2012.

V. Parida, O. Pesämaa, J. Wincent, and M. Westerberg, “Network capability, innovativeness, and performance: a multidimensional extension for entrepreneurship,” Entrep. Reg. Dev., vol. 29, no. 1–2, pp. 94–115, 2017.

Y. Wu, X. Xie, C. Lassala, and S. Ribeiro-Navarrete, “Bribery, female-led start-ups and product innovation performance in transition economies: the moderating roles of institutional support and self-control,” Manag. Decis., 2023.

L. Yao, X. Li, R. Zheng, and Y. Zhang, “The impact of air pollution perception on urban settlement intentions of young talent in China,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 19, no. 3, p. 1080, 2022.

S.-K. Choi, S. Han, and K.-T. Kwak, “Innovation capabilities and the performance of start-ups in korea: the role of government support policies,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 11, p. 6009, 2021.

K. D. Dorcas, B. N. Celestin, and S. Yunfei, “Entrepreneurs traits/characteristics and innovation performance of waste recycling start-ups in Ghana: an application of the upper echelons theory among SEED award winners,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 11, p. 5794, 2021.

S. Sun and Q. Y. Tao, “The relationship between technological innovation ability, atmosphere and innovation performance,” Int. J. Inf. Syst. Supply Chain Manag., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 47–58, 2020.

K. Liu, “Research on the core competitiveness of short video industry in the context of big data—a case study of tiktok of bytedance company,” … Journal of Industrial and Business Management. scirp.org, 2022.

G. Qu, J. Chen, Y. Jie, L. Wang, and D. Guo, “The prosocial-motivated process of meaningful innovation: evidence from Chinese start-ups in digital industry,” Asia Pacific Bus. Rev., pp. 1–18, 2023.

Y. Iskandar, J. Joeliaty, U. Kaltum, and H. Hilmiana, “Bibliometric Analysis on Social Entrepreneurship Specialized Journals,” J. WSEAS Trans. Environ. Dev., pp. 941–951, 2021, doi: 10.37394/232015.2021.17.87.

S. Supriandi and H. N. Muthmainah, “Penerapan Teknologi Mesin Pembelajaran Dalam Sistem Manufaktur: Kajian Bibliometrik,” J. Multidisiplin West Sci., vol. 2, no. 09, pp. 833–846, 2023.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-31

How to Cite

Mardiani, E., Dewi, A. S., Panjaitan, F. A. B. K., & Damau, U. O. (2023). Innovation Performance Measurement in Entrepreneurial Business: A Comparative Study between Start-ups and More Established Enterprises. West Science Journal Economic and Entrepreneurship, 1(10), 504–515. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsjee.v1i10.302

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 10 (2023): West Science Journal Economic and Entrepreneurship

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Eri Mardiani, A.Ratna Sari Dewi, Feliks Anggia Binsar Kristian Panjaitan, Unika Oktaviani Damau

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.