The Impact of E-Government on Governance in the Case of ASIA Countries in 2020

This study aims the impact of each governance indicator in 30 Asian countries through an analysis of the 2020 Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) and E-Government Development Index (EGDI). This study uses quantitative methods. Visual analysis of coded data using Google Data Studio with table functionality and SmartPLS version 3.0 software. samples from 30 Asian countries. The results are as follows: First, the effect of his EGDI on WGI, only one of each correlation metric had an invalid value that is voice and accountability with a value of 0.386, suggesting a potential impact on freedom of expression. Association and social media in 30 Asian countries are still low, with an original sample value (O) of 0.824, the sample mean (M) of 0.832, STDEV of 0.043, a t-statistic of 19.318, and P-value of 0.000. Second, according to the data processing results of Google Data Studio, each indicator such as COC, GE, PSA, RL, RQ, VA has a positive value, and among the 30 Asian countries affecting each indicator, Singapore scores very high. Then Pakistan, achieved an average score out of 30 Asian countries. Although this is a negative number, COC, GE, PSA, RL, RQ, and VA indicators still need improvement.


INTRODUCTION
1. Control of Corruption (COC) aims to measure the extent to which someone in government uses their power for personal gain, whether it involves small to large-scale corruption [26].
2. Government Effectiveness (GE) aims to explain people's perceptions of the quality of public services, civil services, the implementation of formulated policies, and their independence from political pressure, as well as the government's obligation to further improve quality [27].
3. Political Stability and Absence of Governance Violence/Terrorism (PSA) aims to measure the possibility of overthrowing a country's government through unconstitutional violence, including acts of terrorism [28].
4. The Rule of Law (RL) aims to explain how the government is responsible for the laws passed and the important role these laws play in protecting people's basic rights by improving the quality of law enforcement [29]. Several factors measure the functioning of a rule of lawstate, namely: no corruption, human rights, security and order, and civil and criminal justice [30].

5.
Regulatory Quality (RQ) aims to explain the public's view of the credibility of the government to make or formulate good policies that benefit the community, and the rules or policies that are made can encourage the development of the private sector [31].
6. Voice and Accountability (VA) aims to explain how the general public participates in the election of a government or leader and the broad freedoms that citizens enjoy in this regard such as freedom of speech, association, and the media [32].

METHODS
This study uses a descriptive quantitative method and hypothesis testing. The data used is secondary data. The variables tested consist of dependent and independent variables. The dependent variable is economic growth, while the independent variable is an indicator of government governance (WGI) which is explained by proxy Voice and Accountability, Political

A. Result
This finding used 2 EGDI and WGI indicators: are relatively suitable for measuring perceptions [33]. Hypotheses are marked with arrows between structures [34]. The data is the output of the load coefficient which is used as a basis for measuring and knowing the results of the interpretation of outer loading.    In table 3 and table 4, each EGDI and WGI indicator has a validity value. If the value is below 0.5 then the value is invalid, but when the value is above 0.7 it can be said to be valid [36].    Testing is done by looking at the path coefficient output from the bootstrap resampling results.            Table 8 shows that of the 30 countries in Asia, Singapore is the country with the Online Service Index (OSI), Telecommunication Infrastructure Index, and Human Capital Index (HCI) scores which have the highest scores in the Asian region. Singapore ranks first in the most combined rankings, indicating that Singapore's government is considered highly effective. First, control of corruption obtains a value of 100% meaning that public power is used for personal gain, including forms of corruption, large and small, as well as state appropriation by elites for personal gain. While a single party played a key role in establishing the rules and guidelines that made Singapore the success it is today, there is tight control over the media and conservative cultural values drive many of the country's laws.  The results of the cross-loading analysis show that there is no discriminant validity problem. Test the hypothesis that the 2020 EGDI has an effect on the 2020 WGI and is accepted. The Construct

b) The country of Pakistan with a Middle Scores from 30 Countries
Reliability and Validity test shows that the composite reliability value for EGDI 2020 is 0.917 and WGI 2020 is 0.938, the Cronbach's Alpha value for EGDI 2020 is 0.864 and WGI 2020 is 0.916 and the AVE value for EGDI 2020 is 0.787 and for WGI 2020 is 0.730 all of which are categorized entered into the criteria of discriminant validity with a value above 0.70.
The success of EGDI 2020 against WGI 2020 is found in countries with Very High scores, namely Singapore, and Middle scores, namely Pakistan. For the country Singapore can be said to be very effective from the six WGI indicators, the country runs according to its principles and can be an example for other Asian countries. For Pakistan, it is still categorized as successful, but there needs to be improved so that it can run according to WGI principles even better in the country. The six principles include indicators of control of corruption, government effectiveness, political stability and absence of violence/terrorism, rule of law, regulatory quality, and voice and accountability. Both of them produce varied and fluctuating policies.