A Bibliometric Analysis of Government Budget Efficiency and Effectiveness: Trends and Future Directions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v2i08.1224Keywords:
Government Budget Efficiency, Budget Effectiveness, Public Administration, Bibliometric Analysis, VOSviewerAbstract
This study conducts a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the literature on government budget efficiency and effectiveness, spanning publications from 1956 to 2024. Utilizing data exclusively from Google Scholar and employing VOSviewer for visualization, the analysis identifies key trends, influential themes, and research gaps within the field. The centrality of "effectiveness" in the literature underscores its critical role in public administration and fiscal policy, while emerging topics such as "policy," "cost effectiveness," and "e-government" highlight the growing importance of integrating economic efficiency and digital innovation into government budgeting practices. Persistent challenges, including issues of "transparency" and "corruption," indicate areas that require ongoing attention to enhance the overall effectiveness of government budgetary processes. The study's findings offer valuable insights for policymakers and researchers, suggesting a balanced approach that incorporates strategic policy-making, technological advancements, and robust accountability measures to optimize the use of public resources.
References
A. M. Thomas, “Adam Smith on the philosophy and provision of education,” J. Interdiscip. Econ., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 105–116, 2018.
H. A. Johnson, Strategic Management Competencies for Radical Innovation in a Volatile, Uncertain, Complex, and Ambiguous (VUCA) World: a Systematic Review of the Evidence. University of Maryland University College, 2020.
M. D. Lee, K. A. Gluck, and M. M. Walsh, “Understanding the complexity of simple decisions: Modeling multiple behaviors and switching strategies.,” Decision, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 335, 2019.
M. D. Bauer and G. D. Rudebusch, “Monetary policy expectations at the zero lower bound,” J. Money, Credit Bank., vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 1439–1465, 2016.
P. R. Thompson, W. F. Fagan, and P. P. A. Staniczenko, “Predictor species: Improving assessments of rare species occurrence by modeling environmental co‐responses,” Ecol. Evol., vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 3293–3304, 2020.
E. L. Beardsley, J. R. Robinson, and P. A. Wong, “What’s my target? Individual analyst forecasts and last-chance earnings management,” J. Account. Econ., vol. 72, no. 1, p. 101423, 2021.
N. Harris, “Cultivating Collective Sensemaking: Exploring How Academic Deans Shape Academic Priorities During the Annual Budget Review.” 2017.
C. E. O’Leary, To die for: The paradox of American patriotism. Princeton University Press, 2018.
N. T. Hamda et al., “Applying a simplified energy-budget model to explore the effects of temperature and food availability on the life history of green sturgeon (Acipenser medirostris),” Ecol. Modell., vol. 395, pp. 1–10, 2019.
E. O. Turner and A. K. Spain, “The multiple meanings of (in) equity: Remaking school district tracking policy in an era of budget cuts and accountability,” Urban Educ., vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 783–812, 2020.
P.-H. Nguyen et al., “Linking investment decisions-based on firm performance and open innovation practices in Vietnam’s wire and cable market using data envelopment analysis models,” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 9, no. 2, p. 100080, 2023.
B. Attard-Frost and K. Lyons, “Perceptions of Canada’s AI Governance System: Findings from Interviews with 20 Government Leaders & Subject Matter Experts,” Available SSRN, 2024.
E. Park et al., “Attitudes of Korean smokers towards smoke-free public places: findings from the longitudinal ITC Korea Survey, 2005–2010,” BMJ Open, vol. 9, no. 8, p. e025298, 2019.
M. Childs, M. Brown, M. Keppell, Z. Nicholas, C. Hunter, and N. Hard, “Managing institutional change through distributive leadership approaches: Engaging academics and teaching staff in blended and flexible learning,” 2013.
T. Thornberry et al., “The Stratospheric Aerosol Processes, Budget and Radiative Effects (SABRE) airborne science mission,” in AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, 2021, pp. A35Q-1865.
S.-L. Bureaucracy, “Dilemmas of the individual in public services,” New York Russell Sage Found., 1980.
D. Osborne, “Reinventing government,” Public Product. Manag. Rev., pp. 349–356, 1993.
C. Pollitt and G. Bouckaert, Public management reform: A comparative analysis-into the age of austerity. Oxford university press, 2017.
M. R. Gold, Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford university press, 1996.
J. M. Bryson, Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement. John Wiley & Sons, 2018.
J. Manyika, “Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity,” McKinsey Glob. Inst., vol. 1, 2011.
M. H. Moore, Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard university press, 1997.
P. A. Longley and J. A. Cheshire, “Geographical information systems,” in The Routledge Handbook of Mapping and Cartography, Routledge, 2017, pp. 251–258.
R. H. Chenhall, “Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future,” Accounting, Organ. Soc., vol. 28, no. 2–3, pp. 127–168, 2003.
K. B. Lowe, K. G. Kroeck, and N. Sivasubramaniam, “Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature,” Leadersh. Q., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 385–425, 1996.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Loso Judijanto, Weda Febriyanto, Tera Lesmana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Facebook 
Instagram 
Twitter 
Youtube 
+62 821 1557 5700 
info@westscience-press.com 