Bibliometric Analysis of the Effectiveness of Accountability in Public Policy

Authors

  • Loso Judijanto IPOSS Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Nanang Qosim Universitas Alkhairaat
  • Saparman Saparman Universitas Abdul Azis Lamadjido Palu
  • Didik Suhariyanto Universitas Bung Karno

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v3i01.1638

Keywords:

Accountability, Public Policy, Governance, Transparency, Bibliometric Analysis

Abstract

This study conducts a bibliometric analysis to explore the scholarly landscape on the effectiveness of accountability in public policy, focusing on literature indexed in Scopus. Using VOSviewer, the study visualizes thematic clusters, co-authorship networks, and country collaborations, offering insights into key trends, influential authors, and global research dynamics. Accountability emerges as a central concept, closely linked to transparency, governance, and public trust, with significant applications in sectors such as healthcare, education, and sustainable development. The analysis reveals the interdisciplinary nature of accountability research while highlighting gaps in addressing digital governance and underrepresented regional perspectives. The findings emphasize the importance of robust accountability frameworks in enhancing public policy effectiveness and the need for integrative and inclusive research to address contemporary governance challenges. This study provides valuable insights for academics and policymakers, offering a foundation for advancing accountability frameworks in diverse governance contexts.

References

J. Steets, Accountability in public policy partnerships. Springer Nature, 2010.

M. Bovens, T. Schillemans, and P. Hart, “Does public accountability work? An assessment tool,” Public Adm., vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 225–242, 2008.

B. G. Peters, “Accountability in public administration,” Oxford Handb. public Account., pp. 211–225, 2014.

A. Weale, “New Modes of Governance, Political Accountability and Public Reason1,” Gov. Oppos., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 58–80, 2011.

A. B. Cendon, “Accountability and public administration: Concepts, dimensions, developments,” Openness Transpar. Gov. Challenges Oppor., pp. 22–61, 2000.

S. Odugbemi and T. Lee, Accountability through public opinion: from inertia to public action. World Bank Publications, 2011.

N. McGarvey, “Accountability in public administration: A multi-perspective framework of analysis,” Public Policy Adm., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 17–29, 2001.

P. Ricci, “Accountability,” in Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance, Springer, 2023, pp. 38–43.

I. Pérez Durán, “Assessing formal accountability for public policies: the case of health policy in Spain,” Int. Rev. Adm. Sci., vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 784–806, 2016.

S. Buckley, K. Duer, T. Mendel, and S. Ó. Siochrú, “Broadcasting, voice, and accountability: A public interest approach to policy, law, and regulation,” World Bank Publ., 2008.

P. Lægreid, “Accountability and new public management,” Oxford Handb. public Account., pp. 324–338, 2014.

J. Steffek, “Public accountability and the public sphere of international governance,” Ethics Int. Aff., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 45–67, 2010.

W. Cameron, “Public accountability: Effectiveness, equity, ethics,” Aust. J. public Adm., vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 59–67, 2004.

J. D. Clinton and J. A. Grissom, “Public information, public learning and public opinion: Democratic accountability in education policy,” J. Public Policy, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 355–385, 2015.

S. Paul, “Accountability in public services: exit, voice and control,” World Dev., vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 1047–1060, 1992.

M. D. Dowdle, Public accountability: Designs, dilemmas and experiences. Cambridge University Press, 2006.

S. Smyth, “Public accountability: A critical approach,” J. Financ. Manag. public Serv., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 27–45, 2007.

J. M. Ackerman, “Social Accountability in the public sector,” 2005.

P. Barberis, “The new public management and a new accountability,” Public Adm., vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 451–470, 1998.

S. Chambers, “Deliberative democratic theory,” Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 307–326, 2003.

S. Jasanoff, Designs on nature: Science and democracy in Europe and the United States. princeton University press, 2005.

E. Kagan, “Presidential administration,” Harv. L. Rev., vol. 114, p. 2245, 2000.

T. Besley and R. Burgess, “The political economy of government responsiveness: Theory and evidence from India,” Q. J. Econ., vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 1415–1451, 2002.

W. F. Pinar, What is curriculum theory? Routledge, 2019.

Y. Balarajan, S. Selvaraj, and S. V Subramanian, “Health care and equity in India,” Lancet, vol. 377, no. 9764, pp. 505–515, 2011.

C. G. Victora, A. Wagstaff, J. A. Schellenberg, D. Gwatkin, M. Claeson, and J.-P. Habicht, “Applying an equity lens to child health and mortality: more of the same is not enough,” Lancet, vol. 362, no. 9379, pp. 233–241, 2003.

P. Hupe and M. Hill, “Street‐Level bureaucracy and public accountability,” Public Adm., vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 279–299, 2007.

A. Healy and N. Malhotra, “Myopic voters and natural disaster policy,” Am. Polit. Sci. Rev., vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 387–406, 2009.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-31

How to Cite

Judijanto, L., Qosim, N., Saparman, S., & Suhariyanto, D. (2025). Bibliometric Analysis of the Effectiveness of Accountability in Public Policy. West Science Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(01), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v3i01.1638