Preservation of Environmental Ethics Based on Local Wisdom Through Traditional Agriculture Kampung Naga Community

Authors

  • Erni Mulyanie Universitas Siliwangi
  • Muhamad Fauzi Efendi Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v1i09.202

Keywords:

Environment Conservation, Local Wisdom, Traditional Agricultur, Kampung Naga

Abstract

One of the indigenous peoples in Indonesia who still practices a traditional agricultural system that relies on crops to meet their daily needs is the residents of Kampung Naga Tasikmalaya. The people of Kampung Naga can take advantage of everything in their natural environment, but must still preserve and restore these natural products so that the natural conditions in Kampung Naga remain sustainable until now and until the future to ensure the lives of future generations. This study aims to examine community activities in preserving the environment and local wisdom that is still practiced by the people of Kampung Naga in agriculture. The method used in this study is a descriptive qualitative approach with data collection techniques used in the form of observation techniques, interviews, documentation techniques, and literature review. The results of the study show that the people of Kampung Naga in their daily lives hold strong local wisdom values so that they have a positive impact on environmental sustainability. The procedures for processing and breeding agricultural land in Kampung Naga are still traditional and based on tradition.

References

A. S. Keraf, Etika lingkungan hidup. Penerbit Buku Kompas, 2010.

D. Heryadi, Hubungan Kepercayaan Maung Panjalu dengan Banyaknya Hutan Lindung dan Sumber Air di Kabupaten Ciamis. Tasikmalaya: Pascasarjana Universitas Siliwangi, 2006.

Y. Darusman, “Kearifan Lokal dan Pelestarian Lingkungan (Studi Kasus di Kampung Naga, Kabupaten Tasikm,” J. Pendidik. dan Kebud., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 140–154, 2014.

F. Maharlika and D. F. Fatimah, “Tinjauan Konsep Desain Berkelanjutan Pada Arsitektur Rumah Tinggal Di Desa Adat Kampung Naga,” Waca Cipta Ruang, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 337–342, 2019.

W. Musthofa and S. Setiajid, “Peran Kepemimpinan Lembaga Adat Kampung Naga dalam Menjaga Kearifan Lokal Kampung Naga,” Unnes Polit. Sci. J., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 21–25, 2021.

M. M. Aris, “Pengantar etika lingkungan dan Kearifan lokal.” UGM Press.: Yogyakarta, 2013.

D. Sugandi and R. Pascawijaya, “The life patterns of Sinarresmi community in adjusting to environment of landslide prone,” Int. J. Conserv. Sci., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 747–756, 2020.

J. Iskandar and B. S. Iskandar, “Etnoekologi, biodiversitas padi dan modernisasi budidaya padi: studi kasus pada masyarakat baduy dan kampung naga,” J. Biodjati, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 47–62, 2018.

S. Fairuzahira, W. I. Rukmi, and K. E. Sari, “Elemen Pembentuk Permukiman Tradisional Kampung Naga,” J. Tata Kota dan Drh., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 29–38, 2020.

T. Gantini, “Kearifan Lokal Dalam Metode Pengukuran Ketahanan Pangan (Local Wisdom Of Measurement Food Security Method),” Maj. Ilm. UNIKOM, 2015.

S. Ahman, Masyarakat Kampung Naga Tasikmalaya. Tasikmalaya: CV Gajah Poleng, 2004.

A. Mutakin, “Profil Kehidupan Masyarakat Kampung Naga di Tengah-Tengah Arus Modernisasi,” Bandung: Anggita Pustaka Mandiri, 2001.

S. Bella et al., “Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat Kampung Naga Dalam Pelestarian Lingkungan Hidup,” Maj. PEMBELAJARAN Geogr., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 103–118, 2022.

E. Tarmedi, F. Samlawi, and S. Sjarudin, “Sumber Daya dan Kesejahtraan Masyarakat.” Bandung: UPI PRESS, 2008.

S. Purnama, “Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat Adat Kampung Naga Sebagai Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter Berbasis Masyarakat,” J. Pendidik. Sosiol. dan Hum., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 30–36, 2021.

R. K. Susilo, “Dwi Sosiologi Lingkungan,” Jakarta Rajawali Pers, 2012.

R. Attfield, “Etika lingkungan global,” Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana, 2010.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-19

How to Cite

Erni Mulyanie, & Muhamad Fauzi Efendi. (2023). Preservation of Environmental Ethics Based on Local Wisdom Through Traditional Agriculture Kampung Naga Community. West Science Interdisciplinary Studies, 1(09), 766–775. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v1i09.202