Student Engagement for Students of Psychology Study Program, Universitas Indonesia Membangun

Authors

  • Pratidina Ekanesia Universitas Indonesia Membangun
  • Prinska Damara Sastri Universitas Indonesia Membangun
  • Zakiyah Aulia Sabrina Hanifah Jauhary Universitas Indonesia Membangun

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v1i09.203

Keywords:

Student Engagement, Campus Engagement, Class Engagement

Abstract

The highest level of completing school education is tertiary education. Not many students do not continue their education to university, so they choose to look for work and some choose to work to be able to pay for college. With so many students who are not only preoccupied with lecture matters but participate in activities outside of lecture activities such as participating in organizations both on and off campus and working part-time. But in reality, they often have difficulty dividing their time. This study aims to determine the perception of the situation that keeps them involved in the learning process (student engagement) in Inaba University's Psychology Study Program students. Student engagement consists of two dimensions, namely campus engagement and class engagement. The research was conducted on 87 students of the INABA University Psychology Study Program. The measuring tool used is Student Engagement Scale from Gunuc & Kuzu. The research results show that student engagement INABA University Psychology Study Program students are at a low level of 59%. In addition, dimensions of campus engagement and class engagement INABA University Psychology Study Program students, both of whom are at a low level.

References

J. J. Appleton, S. L. Christenson, and M. J. Furlong, “Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct,” Psychol. Sch., vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 369–386, 2008.

S. Hu and G. D. Kuh, “Being (dis) engaged in educationally purposeful activities: The influences of student and institutional characteristics,” Res. High. Educ., vol. 43, pp. 555–575, 2002.

E. Gebre, A. Saroyan, and R. Bracewell, “Students’ engagement in technology rich classrooms and its relationship to professors’ conceptions of effective teaching,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 45, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1111/bjet.12001.

E. Skinner, J. G. Wellborn, and J. P. Connell, “What It Takes to Do Well in School and Whether I’ve Got It: A Process Model of Perceived Control and Children’s Engagement and Achievement in School,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 82, pp. 22–32, Mar. 1990, doi: 10.1037//0022-0663.82.1.22.

M. M. Handelsman, W. L. Briggs, N. Sullivan, and A. Towler, “A measure of college student course engagement,” J. Educ. Res., vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 184–192, 2005.

E. Chapman, “Alternative approaches to assessing student engagement rates,” Pract. Assessment, Res. Eval., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 13, 2002.

R. D. Axelson and A. Flick, “Defining student engagement,” Chang. Mag. High. Learn., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 38–43, 2010.

S. Gunuc and A. Kuzu, “Student engagement scale: development, reliability and validity,” Assess. Eval. High. Educ., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 587–610, 2015.

J. D. Finn, M. A. Forden, S. Verdinelli, and G. M. Pannozzo, “Evaluation of the class size reduction initiative–Buffalo Public Schools,” Buffalo, NY Univ. Buffalo, Grad. Sch. Educ., 2001.

F. Bilge, M. Tuzgol Dost, and B. Cetin, “Factors Affecting Burnout and School Engagement among High School Students: Study Habits, Self-Efficacy Beliefs, and Academic Success.,” Educ. Sci. Theory Pract., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1721–1727, 2014.

F. Arlinkasari and S. Z. Akmal, “Hubungan antara school engagement, academic self-efficacy dan academic burnout pada mahasiswa,” Humanit. (Jurnal Psikologi), vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 81–102, 2017.

T. A. P. Pamungkas, “Pengaruh motivasi berprestasi terhadap student engagement mahasiswa bk UNY,” J. Ris. Mhs. Bimbing. dan Konseling, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 126–136, 2021.

D. Fitrianita and Y. A. Rozali, “GAMBARAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR PADA MAHASISWA KELAS REGULER YANG MENGIKUTI KELAS DARING DI UNIVERSITAS ESA UNGGUL,” JCA Psychol., vol. 2, no. 01, 2021.

I. Z. Ratnaningsih, U. Prihatsanti, and A. R. Prasetyo, “Perbedaan student engagement pada mahasiswa ditinjau dari jenis kelamin dan masa studi,” Seminar Nasional Psikologi UMS 2018, 2018.

F. P. Rice and K. G. Dolgin, “The adolescent. development, relationships, and culture. Twelft Edition.” USA: Pearson Education, Inc, 2008.

I. Magdalena, H. N. Fauzi, and R. Putri, “Pentingnya evaluasi dalam pembelajaran dan akibat memanipulasinya,” Bintang, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 244–257, 2020.

S. Orpina and S. A. Prahara, “Self-efficacy dan burnout akademik pada mahasiswa yang bekerja,” Indones. J. Educ. Couns., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 119–130, 2019.

N. Mafaza, F. Kawuryan, and R. B. Pramono, “Kebahagiaan Mahasiswa ditinjau dari Optimisme dan Student Engagement,” J. Psikol. Perseptual, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 148–159, 2021.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-17

How to Cite

Pratidina Ekanesia, Prinska Damara Sastri, & Hanifah Jauhary, Z. A. S. (2023). Student Engagement for Students of Psychology Study Program, Universitas Indonesia Membangun. West Science Interdisciplinary Studies, 1(09), 714–720. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v1i09.203

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 09 (2023): West Science Interdisciplinary Studies

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Pratidina Ekanesia, Prinska Damara Sastri, Zakiyah Aulia Sabrina Hanifah Jauhary

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.