Identification of Student Learning Style Preference Profiles in Hybrid Learning Settings: An Essential Consideration for Developing Learning Strategies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v1i09.205Keywords:
Learning Style Preference, VARK, Latent Profile AnalysisAbstract
After Covid-19, several educational institutions have adopted the hybrid learning system. The transition of learning systems from face-to-face to hybrid settings presents obstacles and challenges that require adaptive solutions. The compatibility between hybrid learning systems and student learning style preferences is an issue that needs to be studied in more depth. Students have their preferred way when it comes to learning. They prefer to learn through visual (V), aural (A), read-write (R), or kinesthetic (K). Depending on their learning styles, student adaptation may have been challenging. In this regard, a study was designed to identify the learning style preferences among students. The VARK questionnaire is one of the most widely used diagnostic tools, allowing teachers to understand students' learning preferences and develop innovative learning practices. A quantitative cross-sectional design was conducted among students (n=486) in Univeristy X using the VARK questionnaire. Student learning style preferences were identified using latent profile analysis. Our findings suggest that most students were identified as having multiple learning modalities, while the rest had a single learning modality. Prevalence of kinesthetic and aural learning styles preference highest among students, followed by visual and read-write learning styles. Understanding how students retain the knowledge imparted to them is essential for lecturers to develop innovative and adaptive strategies.
References
W. K. Aji, H. Ardin, and M. A. Arifin, “Blended learning during pandemic corona virus: Teachers’ and students’ perceptions,” IDEAS J. English Lang. Teach. Learn. Linguist. Lit., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 632–646, 2020.
A. L. M. Garcia, E. Redel, and F. M. Martiny, “Blended German Courses and Learning Model in Brazil: a challenging contemporary trend?,” Pandaemonium Ger., vol. 24, pp. 137–164, 2021.
A. Skulmowski and G. D. Rey, “COVID‐19 as an accelerator for digitalization at a German university: Establishing hybrid campuses in times of crisis,” Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 212–216, 2020.
T. Tribuanaswary, “The Effect of Hybrid Learning Activity on Students’ Writing Ability during Pandemic.” Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, 2022.
S. Maesaroh and I. S. Masyitoh, “Hybrid learning in civic education during pandemic COVID-19 in international school,” in Annual Civic Education Conference (ACEC 2021), Atlantis Press, 2022, pp. 434–440.
S. Erliza and P. A. Septianingsih, “Undergraduate Students’ Perception of Hybrid Learning: Voices from English Language Education Students in Pandemic Era,” J. English Lang. Teach. Linguist., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 231–243, 2022.
A. Raes, L. Detienne, I. Windey, and F. Depaepe, “A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: gaps identified,” Learn. Environ. Res., vol. 23, pp. 269–290, 2020.
A. Raes, “Exploring student and teacher experiences in hybrid learning environments: Does presence matter?,” Postdigital Sci. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 138–159, 2022.
E. Sanecka, “Procrastination in blended learning the role of general self-efficacy, and active and passive procrastination,” Int. J. Res. E-learning, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 49–65, 2019.
H. Muttaqin, S. Mokodenseho, and F. Widjayanto, “Defending Indonesian Sovereignty through Mass Media: Radio Rimba Raya in the Revolutionary War,” Indones. Hist. Stud. Vol 6, No 1, 2022, doi: 10.14710/ihis.v6i1.13821.
J.-H. Zhang, L. Zou, J. Miao, Y.-X. Zhang, G.-J. Hwang, and Y. Zhu, “An individualized intervention approach to improving university students’ learning performance and interactive behaviors in a blended learning environment,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 231–245, 2020.
N. Doghonadze, T. Dolidze, and N. Vasadze, “Comparing Effectiveness of F2F, Hybrid and Online English as a Foreign Language Learning in Higher Education,” IRCEELT-2021, p. 384, 2021.
W. A. Drago and R. J. Wagner, “Vark preferred learning styles and online education,” Manag. Res. News, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1–13, 2004.
B. Daoruang, A. Mingkhwan, and C. Sanrach, “The Learning Material Classified Model Using VARK Learning Style,” in The Impact of the 4th Industrial Revolution on Engineering Education: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL2019)–Volume 2 22, Springer, 2020, pp. 505–513.
L. C. Sarasin and L. M. Celli, Learning style perspectives: Impact in the classroom. Atwood Publications, 1999.
N. Csapo and R. Hayen, “The role of learning styles in the teaching/learning process,” Issues Inf. Syst., vol. 7, pp. 129–133, Jan. 2006.
N. Entwistle and E. Peterson, “Learning Styles and Approaches to Studying,” 2017. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.05623-6.
N. D. Fleming and C. Mills, “Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection,” To Improv. Acad., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 137–155, 1992.
W. Leite, M. Svinicki, and Y. Shi, “Attempted Validation of the Scores of the VARK: Learning Styles Inventory With Multitrait–Multimethod Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models,” Educ. Psychol. Meas. - EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, vol. 70, pp. 323–339, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.1177/0013164409344507.
N. D. Fleming, “VARK visual, aural/auditory, read/write, kinesthetic,” New Zeal. Bonwell Green Mt. Falls, 2006.
N. D. Fleming, “The 2009 VARK scoring trial.” 2016.
B. Daoruang, K. Sintanakul, and A. Mingkhwan, “The study of learning achievement of learners classified VARK learning style in blended learning,” in Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval, 2019, pp. 34–38.
T. Asparouhov and B. Muthén, “Residual associations in latent class and latent transition analysis,” Struct. Equ. Model. A Multidiscip. J., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 169–177, 2015.
B. Muthén, “Second-generation structural equation modeling with a combination of categorical and continuous latent variables: New opportunities for latent class–latent growth modeling.,” 2001.
H. W. Marsh, O. Lüdtke, U. Trautwein, and A. J. S. Morin, “Classical latent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions: Synergy of person-and variable-centered approaches to theoretical models of self-concept,” Struct. Equ. Model. A Multidiscip. J., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 191–225, 2009.
N. Fleming and D. Baume, “Learning Styles Again: VARKing up the right tree!,” Educ. Dev., vol. 7, no. 4, p. 4, 2006.
R. J. Murphy, S. A. Gray, S. R. Straja, and M. C. Bogert, “Student learning preferences and teaching implications,” J. Dent. Educ., vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 859–866, 2004.
Z. Baykan and M. Naçar, “Learning styles of first-year medical students attending Erciyes University in Kayseri, Turkey,” Adv. Physiol. Educ., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 158–160, 2007.
H. Moayyeri, “The Impact of Undergraduate Students’ Learning Preferences (VARK Model) on Their Language Achievement.,” J. Lang. Teach. Res., vol. 6, no. 1, 2015.
M. A. Asiry, “Learning styles of dental students,” Saudi J. Dent. Res., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 13–17, 2016.
R. N. Cortright, H. L. Collins, and S. E. DiCarlo, “Peer instruction enhanced meaningful learning: ability to solve novel problems,” Adv. Physiol. Educ., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 107–111, 2005.
H. L. Lujan and S. E. DiCarlo, “First-year medical students prefer multiple learning styles,” Adv. Physiol. Educ., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 13–16, 2006.
S. Payaprom and Y. Payaprom, “Identifying learning styles of language learners: A useful step in moving towards the learner-centred approach,” J. Lang. Linguist. Stud., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 59–72, 2020.
M. S. Ameer and S. Parveen, “Kinesthetic Learners During the COVID-19 Pandemic in School going Students: A Perspective on E-learning”,” Indian J. Physiother. Occup. Ther., vol. 17, no. 1, 2023.
S. R. Manzoor, W.-N. Mohd-Isa, and K. S. Dollmat, “Post-pandemic e-learning: a pre-protocol to assess the integration of mobile VR and its effect on VARK learning styles (preprint),” 2021.
N. N. Rasdi and A. N. Rusli, “VARK learning style preferences among Malaysian university students in Open and Distance Learning (ODL),” 2023.
H. M. Truong, “Integrating learning styles and adaptive e-learning system: Current developments, problems and opportunities,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 55, pp. 1185–1193, 2016.
L. Herod, “Learning styles and strategies,” Adult Learn. Lit., pp. 310–800, 2004.
N. Stash, “Incorporating cognitive/learning styles in a general-purpose adaptive hypermedia system,” ACM SIGWEB Newsl., vol. 2007, no. Winter, pp. 3-es, 2007.
M. Syahrir, “THE COMPARISON BETWEEN AUDITORY AND VISUAL LEARNERS TOWARD WRITING ABILITY OF THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS IN SMA NEGERI 1 BARRU.” Universitas Negeri Makassar, 2019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Aldinel Fikri, Kartika Nuradina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Facebook 
Instagram 
Twitter 
Youtube 
+62 821 1557 5700
westscience.journals@gmail.com