Analyzing Knowledge Networks in Health Care through Collaborative Research Exploration

Authors

  • Diki Prayugo Wibowo Sekolah Tinggi Farmasi Indonesia
  • Ria Mariani Universitas Garut
  • Novian Aldo Poltekkes Kemenkes Tanjungpinang
  • Sulistyo Andarmoyo Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v1i10.293

Keywords:

Knowledge, Networks, Health Care, Bibliometric Analys

Abstract

The exploration of collaborative research in healthcare is a dynamic and multifaceted endeavor, as evidenced by analysis of influential articles, citation patterns, and keyword frequencies. Davenport and Prusak's seminal work on knowledge management serves as a foundational foundation, emphasizing the critical role of effective knowledge utilization and sharing in collaborative healthcare research. This research explores linkages with other influential articles, including Scott's examination of social network analysis, Star and Griesemer's insights on institutional ecology, and Tranfield et al.'s methodology on evidence-based knowledge management. Further analysis extends to works on thematic analysis, inter-organizational collaboration, cancer genomics, and qualitative research methods, all of which contribute to a rich tapestry of collaborative healthcare research. Keyword analysis revealed thematic priorities, with a major focus on "Care" and "Experience", emphasizing the human dimension of healthcare. Challenges, technology and organizational aspects emerged as prominent themes, reflecting a holistic approach to collaborative exploration. The interplay between keywords such as "Dynamic", "Mechanisms", and "Performance" underscores the evolving nature of collaborative efforts and the need for strategic mechanisms to address challenges and improve performance. The analysis also highlights contemporary concerns, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, barriers to collaboration, and the intersection of mental health and social media.

References

Y. Iskandar, “Hubungan Self-Efficacy dengan Prokrastinasi Akademik Mahasiswa Semester 5 Fakultas Bisnis dan Humaniora Universitas Nusa Putra (Sebuah Proposal Penelitian),” J. Psikol. dan Konseling West Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 43–52, 2023.

M. A. K. Harahap, F. Tanipu, A. Manuhutu, and S. Supriandi, “Relations between Architecture, Urban Planning, Environmental Engineering, and Sociology in Sustainable Urban Design in Indonesia (Literature Study),” J. Geosains West Sci., vol. 1, no. 02, pp. 77–88, 2023.

G. Rusmayadi, S. Supriandi, and R. Pahrijal, “Trends and Impact of Sustainable Energy Technologies in Mechanical Engineering: A Bibliometric Study,” West Sci. Interdiscip. Stud., vol. 1, no. 09, pp. 831–841, 2023.

S. Klawetter, J. C. Greenfield, S. R. Speer, K. Brown, and S. S. Hwang, “An integrative review: maternal engagement in the neonatal intensive care unit and health outcomes for US-born preterm infants and their parents,” AIMS public Heal., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 160, 2019.

Y. Chen, C. Li, and H. Wang, “Big Data and Predictive Analytics for Business Intelligence: A Bibliographic Study (2000–2021),” Forecasting, 2022.

U. B. Jaman and A. Zulfikri, “Peran serta Masyarakat dalam Pencegahan Kekerasan Seksual dihubungkan dengan UU No. 12 Tahun 2022 Tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual,” J. Huk. dan HAM Wara Sains, vol. 1, no. 01, pp. 1–7, 2022.

A. Sugandi et al., “Trauma Healing dan Edukasi Pasca Gempa Bagi Anak-Anak Desa Sarampad,” Easta J. Innov. Community Serv., vol. 1, no. 03, pp. 80–85, 2023, doi: 10.58812/ejincs.v1i03.109.

B. Volkov, J. Cieslak, R. Matthes, and C. Pulley, “3402 A High-Impact, Structured, Collaborative Approach to Implementing and Utilizing the Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR) for a Clinical and Translational Science Award,” J. Clin. Transl. Sci., vol. 3, no. s1, pp. 137–138, 2019.

K. Vazouras, B. D. S. Gayathri Shenoy, and I. F. Dragan, “Using Project Management Principles to Facilitate Interdisciplinary Collaboration,” Compendium, vol. 43, no. 2, 2022.

A. Alanazi, “Clinicians’ Views on Using Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Opportunities, Challenges, and Beyond,” Cureus, vol. 15, no. 9, 2023.

S. Zhu, Y. Liu, Z. Gu, and Y. Zhao, “A bibliometric analysis of advanced healthcare materials: Research trends of biomaterials in healthcare application,” Adv. Healthc. Mater., vol. 10, no. 10, p. 2002222, 2021.

R. R. Sankaran, J. M. Ameling, A. E. M. Cohn, C. M. Grum, and J. Meddings, “A practical guide for building collaborations between clinical researchers and engineers: lessons learned from a multidisciplinary patient safety project,” J. Patient Saf., vol. 17, no. 8, p. e1420, 2021.

M. Capan et al., “From data to improved decisions: operations research in healthcare delivery,” Med. Decis. Mak., vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 849–859, 2017.

S. M. Shortreed, A. J. Cook, R. Y. Coley, J. F. Bobb, and J. C. Nelson, “Challenges and opportunities for using big health care data to advance medical science and public health,” Am. J. Epidemiol., vol. 188, no. 5, pp. 851–861, 2019.

S. V. G. Subrahmanya et al., “The role of data science in healthcare advancements: applications, benefits, and future prospects,” Irish J. Med. Sci., vol. 191, no. 4, pp. 1473–1483, 2022.

N. T. Oktaviani, E. P. Purnomo, L. Salsabila, and A. T. Fathani, “Bibliometric analysis of sustainable agriculture on human rights governance approach: concept of sustainability on human rights governance,” in E3S Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, 2021, p. 2008.

Y. Iskandar, J. Joeliaty, U. Kaltum, and H. Hilmiana, “Bibliometric analysis on social entrepreneurship specialized journals,” WSEAS Trans. Environ. Dev., vol. 17, pp. 941–951, 2021, doi: 10.37394/232015.2021.17.87.

T. H. Davenport and L. Prusak, Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business Press, 1998.

J. Scott, What is social network analysis? Bloomsbury Academic, 2012.

S. L. Star and J. R. Griesemer, “Institutional ecology,translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39,” Soc. Stud. Sci., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 387–420, 1989.

D. Tranfield, D. Denyer, and P. Smart, “Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review,” Br. J. Manag., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 207–222, 2003.

L. S. Nowell, J. M. Norris, D. E. White, and N. J. Moules, “Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria,” Int. J. Qual. methods, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 1609406917733847, 2017.

S. Mueller et al., “What’s holding back social entrepreneurship? Removing the impediments to theoretical advancement,” J. Soc. Entrep., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 245–256, 2015.

J. Gao et al., “Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal,” Sci. Signal., vol. 6, no. 269, pp. pl1–pl1, 2013.

S. B. Merriam and R. S. Grenier, Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. John Wiley & Sons, 2019.

T. R. Lindlof and B. C. Taylor, Qualitative communication research methods. Sage publications, 2017.

L. Moll, C. Amanti, D. Neff, and N. Gonzalez, “Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms,” in Funds of knowledge, Routledge, 2006, pp. 71–87.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-30

How to Cite

Wibowo, D. P., Mariani, R., Aldo, N., & Andarmoyo, S. (2023). Analyzing Knowledge Networks in Health Care through Collaborative Research Exploration . West Science Interdisciplinary Studies, 1(10), 1006–1017. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v1i10.293

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 10 (2023): West Science Interdisciplinary Studies

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Diki Prayugo Wibowo, Ria Mariani, Novian Aldo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.