The Paradox of Punishment: Between Assimilation and Indonesian Public Health During the Covid-19 Pandemic

Authors

  • Putu Bagus Satya Nugraha Udayana University
  • I Nyoman Bagiastra Udayana University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v1i12.467

Keywords:

Assimilation, Prisoners, and Covid-19

Abstract

Since the beginning of 2020, Indonesia has been hit by a deadly virus outbreak known as Corona Virus Disease or Covid-19. Covid-19, which is claimed to be a pandemic, has changed the foundations of all sectors of life, including the legal and criminal system in Indonesia. Various gaps have been created between das sein and das sollen related to the regulations issued by the government to reduce the number of Covid-19 cases. On the one hand, the Ministry of Law and Human Rights in its mandate has established a policy of releasing prisoners through the assimilation and integration rights program as one of the steps to suppress the spread of Covid-19. Contrary to this, on the other hand, a regulation has emerged that threatens the public for those who violate the rules regarding the prevention of this epidemic, especially for violators of Law Number 6 of 2018 concerning Quarantine. These two law enforcement policies will certainly be a punishment paradox where if prisoners are given assimilation, it will have the potential to cause a Covid-19 cluster from prisons to the general public and also has the potential to cause other problems such as committing crimes again. Likewise, if a prokes violator is put in prison, it is possible that he will contract Covid-19 and spread it to prisoners in prison, so this will become very vulnerable considering that the number of prisoners in prison is very large and even over capacity.

References

Maharis Arkham, “Pembinaan Anak Didik Pemasyarakatan Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Anak Kutoarjo Skripsi,” Semarang, Aug. 2015.

R. T. Fajar, F. P. Wahyu, N. Sunan, and G. Djati, “Analisis Tingkat Kesadaran Diri dan Pengetahuan Warga terhadap Protokol Kesehatan Covid-19,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/Proceedings

P. S. Saraswati, “Kebijakan Hukum Terhadap Penanganan Pandemi Covid-19 di Indonesia,” KERTHA WICAKSANA, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 147–152, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.22225/kw.14.2.1923.147-152.

T. P. Kurnianingrum, “Kajian Singkat Terhadap Isu Aktual Dan Strategis,” 2020.

T. Hadumaon Siagian, “Mencari Kelompok Berisiko Tinggi Terinfeksi Virus Corona Dengan Discourse Network Analysis Finding High Risk Groups To Coronavirus Using Discourse Network Analysis,” 2020.

M. Rijuanda, “Pelaksanaan Pembebasan Bersyarat Narapidana,” 2022.

M. P. Gunarto, “Sikap Memidana Yang Berorientasi Pada Tujuan Pemidanaan,” 2009.

Wulandari Sri, “Efektivitas Sistem Pembinaan Narapidana Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Terhadap Tujuan Pemidanaan,” Hukum Dan Dinamika Masyarakat, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 131–142, 2012.

I. K. Sudira, “The Construction Of Penal Mediation Model In Handling Family Neglect Cases In The Future.” [Online]. Available: www.ijern.com

B. Jaya, P. Barus, and V. Sylvia Biafri, “Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Pembinaan Kemandirian Terhadap Narapidana Lanjut Usia Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas I Medan 1,” 2020, doi: 10.31604/jips.v7i1.2020.135-148.

F. S. Pahlevi, “Keadilan Hukum Dalam Peraturan Perlakuan Bagi Tahanan Dan Narapidana Lanjut Usia,” 2019.

N. Devy Irmawanti, B. N. Arief, and K. Berau, “Urgensi Tujuan Dan Pedoman Pemidanaan Dalam Rangka Pembaharuan Sistem Pemidanaan Hukum Pidana.”

Downloads

Published

2023-12-22

How to Cite

Nugraha, P. B. S., & Bagiastra, I. N. (2023). The Paradox of Punishment: Between Assimilation and Indonesian Public Health During the Covid-19 Pandemic. West Science Interdisciplinary Studies, 1(12), 1455–1460. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v1i12.467