Ethnoecological Perspectives on Agroforestry Practices for Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation

Authors

  • Yohanes Kamakaula Agribusiness Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Papua

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v2i04.786

Keywords:

Ethnoecological Perspective, Agroforestry, Climate Change, Mitigation, Adaptation

Abstract

This research investigates the ethnoecological perspective of agroforestry practices for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Through a literature review method, we analyze relevant literature from various sources to uncover the relationship between local wisdom and agroforestry practices in addressing the challenges of climate change. Findings indicate that the ethnoecological perspective plays a crucial role in shaping sustainable and adaptive agroforestry practices by integrating local knowledge of local ecology and climate patterns with modern scientific knowledge. Agroforestry not only contributes to mitigating greenhouse gas emissions and carbon storage but also provides effective adaptation solutions through season-based planting arrangements and the cultivation of species resilient to extreme conditions. By recognizing the value of local wisdom and knowledge and actively involving community participation in agroforestry management, we can strengthen the resilience and sustainability of agroforestry systems in facing climate change.

References

D. Diswandi, “Community Forestry Management for Climate Change Adaptation,” in Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation, Springer, 2022, pp. 2681–2693.

S. C. Sakapaji, “Integrating Local and Indigenous Ecological Knowledge (IEK) Systems into Climate Adaptation Policy for Resilience Building, and Sustainability in Agriculture,” Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Res., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 9–24, 2022.

C. Steger et al., “Local Ecological Knowledge Indicates Pathways Towards Equitable and Sustainable Management of the Sudano-Guinean Savanna,” Hum. Ecol., pp. 1–22, 2024.

V. Reyes-García and A. B. Junqueira, “Climatic and ecological change in the Americas: A perspective from historical ecology,” Clim. Ecol. Chang. Am., no. 1, pp. 229–238, 2023.

J. Wall et al., “The role of traditional livelihood practices and local ethnobotanical knowledge in mitigating chestnut disease and pest severity in Turkey,” Forests, vol. 10, no. 7, p. 571, 2019.

C. R. Bobsin, B. T. Bormann, M. L. Miller, and B. D. Pelach, “Perspectives: Ethnoforestry, ecosystem wellbeing, and collaborative learning in the Pacific Northwest,” For. Ecol. Manage., vol. 529, p. 120738, 2023.

B. Sabar and D. K. Midya, “Intersecting knowledge with landscape: indigenous agriculture, sustainable food production and response to climate change–a case study of Chuktia Bhunjia tribe of Odisha, India,” J. Asian Afr. Stud., vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 123–141, 2024.

Sugiyono, Metodelogi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&G. Bandung: ALFABETA, 2018.

Y. Kamakaula, “Ethnoecology and Climate Change Adaptation in Agriculture,” Glob. Int. J. Innov. Res., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 473–485, 2024.

H. Yang et al., “Role of traditional ecological knowledge and seasonal calendars in the context of climate change: a case study from China,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 12, p. 3243, 2019.

M. N. Q. Ahmed, M. T. A. Chowdhury, K. J. Ahmed, and S. M. A. Haq, “Indigenous peoples’ views on climate change and their experiences, coping and adaptation strategies in South Asia: a review,” Indig. Methodol. Res. Pract. Sustain. Dev., pp. 285–301, 2022.

A. G. Ramirez-Santos, F. Ravera, M. G. Rivera-Ferre, and M. Calvet-Nogués, “Gendered traditional agroecological knowledge in agri-food systems: a systematic review,” J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed., vol. 19, no. 1, p. 11, 2023.

S. Mardero et al., “Traditional knowledge for climate change adaptation in Mesoamerica: A systematic review,” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 100473, 2023.

S. Ali, S. M. Khan, A. Abdullah, M. Rana, and Z. Ahmad, “Dryland agroforestry: mitigating role in reducing air pollution and climate change impacts,” in Agroforestry for Carbon and Ecosystem Management, Elsevier, 2024, pp. 271–282.

C. Liu et al., “Traditional agricultural management of kam sweet rice (Oryza sativa L.) in southeast Guizhou Province, China,” J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed., vol. 18, no. 1, p. 30, 2022.

B. T. Premono, N. Wakhid, D. Handayani, S. Nurzakiah, and H. L. Tata, “Home garden mixed cropping practice by communities living on peatland in household’s income resilience and climate adaptation,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, IOP Publishing, 2024, p. 12003.

M. Suliman et al., “Role of forest’s woody vegetation in the climate change mitigation through carbon sequestration in the northern Pakistan,” in Agroforestry for Carbon and Ecosystem Management, Elsevier, 2024, pp. 191–202.

O. H. Razafindratsima et al., “Reviewing the evidence on the roles of forests and tree-based systems in poverty dynamics,” For. Policy Econ., vol. 131, p. 102576, 2021.

M. Dkhar and B. K. Tiwari, “Traditional ecological knowledge of tribal communities of North East India,” Biodiversitas J. Biol. Divers., vol. 21, no. 7, 2020.

N. Chanza and W. Musakwa, “Revitalizing indigenous ways of maintaining food security in a changing climate: review of the evidence base from Africa,” Int. J. Clim. Chang. Strateg. Manag., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 252–271, 2022.

J. Locqueville, V. Labeyrie, D. McKey, O. L. Sanabria, and S. Caillon, “Semi-domesticated crops have unique functional roles in agroecosystems: perennial beans (Phaseolus dumosus and P. coccineus) and landscape ethnoecology in the Colombian Andes,” J. Ethnobiol., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 198–216, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-17

How to Cite

Kamakaula, Y. (2024). Ethnoecological Perspectives on Agroforestry Practices for Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation. West Science Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(04), 737–742. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v2i04.786