Analysis of The Accountability of Business Actors to Consumers Who are Disadvantaged for Damage to an Item in The Context of Consumer Protection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v2i06.990Keywords:
Responsibility, Business Actors, Consumers, Damage to GoodsAbstract
This study aims to analyze the implementation of accountability from business actors to consumers who are harmed by damage to an item based on the Consumer Protection Act conducted using the literature study. The problem in this study is related to violations of rights rather than consumers for damage to an item purchased related to accountability rather than a business actor that causes these losses. The purpose of the implementation of this research is to analyze the conditions of accountability of business actors to consumers dynamics of their conditions in the territory of Indonesia. Literature study method as a method used to investigate scientific works, reports on the accountability of business actors and official documents that have a connection with the research conducted. The results showed that the accountability of business actors included compensation in the form of refund or returns to the same or equal value, but accountability still had an impact on the decline in consumer confidence in business actors. Conclusion this study states that the permeasun of legal protection efforts given to consumers for losses caused by business actors. The renewal of this research lies in the comprehensive approach used on the issues that occur and conduct in -depth research and not only look on the one hand.
References
N. Languyu, “Kedudukan Hukum Penjual dan Pembeli dalam Bisnis Jual Beli Online,” Lex Soc., vol. 3, no. 9, 2015.
V. Pauth, “Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Terhadap Kerugian Konsumen Akibat Mengkonsumsi Barang dan Jasa Berdasarkan Pasal 19 Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen,” Lex Priv., vol. 6, no. 10, 2019.
N. Salim and E. Pandamdari, “Tanggung Jawab Developer Terhadap Konsumen Akibat Wanprestasi Dalam Penyerahan Unit Apartemen Pluit Sea View Berdasarkan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli,” J. Huk. Adigama, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1310–1334, 2019.
I. Fitri, “Perlindungan konsumen Terhadap Jasa Kesehatan Prespektif Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah (Studi Kasus CV. Meyer Century Kota Metro).” IAIN Metro, 2020.
D. C. Torong, “Analisis Yuridis Wanprestasi Oleh Penjual Dalam Jual Beli Melalui Media Internet,” J. Perspekt. Huk., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 178–191, 2021.
E. K. Dewi, A. A. S. L. Dewi, and I. M. M. Widyantara, “Akibat Hukum Terhadap Pelaksanaan Arisan Online Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016,” J. Konstr. Huk., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 296–302, 2021.
M. L. Tuela, “Upaya Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Barang Yang Diperdagangkan,” Lex Priv., vol. 2, no. 3, 2014.
C. M. Hauliani, “Faktor-Faktor Yang Menjadi Penyebab Timbulnya Wanprestasi Dalam Transaksi E-Commerce,” J. Priv. Law, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 218–225, 2022.
N. N. Palit, “Sanksi Terhadap Pelaku Usaha Yang Melakukan Wanprestasi Menurut Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen No. 8 Tahun 1999,” Lex Priv., vol. 6, no. 7, 2018.
H. D. Panggabean and S. M. Badriyah, “Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Bisnis Biro Travel,” AL-MANHAJ J. Huk. dan Pranata Sos. Islam, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 714–720, 2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ni Kadek Ayu Mega Sri Deviani Putri, I Nyoman Bagiastra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.