Judicial Review and Constitutional Interpretation: The Development of the Role of the Indonesian Constitutional Court
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v1i04.1167Keywords:
Judicial Review, Constitutional Interpretation, Indonesian Constitutional Court, Judicial Activism and Restraint, Fundamental RightsAbstract
This research examines the role of Indonesia's Constitutional Court in constitutional review and interpretation, focusing on its development, key jurisprudential contributions, and the balance between judicial activism and restraint. Through a comprehensive analysis of landmark cases and scholarly literature, this research highlights the impact of the Constitutional Court on law and governance in Indonesia. The research reveals that while the Constitutional Court has demonstrated judicial activism by protecting fundamental rights and shaping the democratic process, it has also exercised restraint to maintain institutional balance and avoid political overreach. The Court's rulings on issues ranging from human rights to electoral law underscore its important role in upholding constitutional principles. However, the research also identified challenges relating to consistency, transparency and independence, which are critical to maintaining the Court's legitimacy and effectiveness. The findings suggest that the Court's ability to address these challenges will be critical to its future role in Indonesia's democratic framework.
References
J. Riyah, “Position and Authority of the Constitutional Court as a State Institution,” JUSTICES J. Law, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 76–85, 2024.
S. Isra and P. M. Faiz, “The Indonesian Constitutional Court: An Overview,” Brill’s Asian Law Ser., p. 55, 2024.
M. Thohir and D. Sukriono, “Implementation Authority Of The Constitutional Court In The Indonesian Constitutional Law System,” Int. J. Business, Law, Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1495–1503, 2023.
A. Ahmad, “Analysis of the Legal Outputs of State Institutions: The Case of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia,” Enigm. Law, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 36–40, 2023.
I. A. Gani, R. Asmara, S. Sulaiman, and A. Husna, “The Constitutional Court’s Protection and Fulfilment of the Citizens’ Rights: Constitutional and Islamic Law Perspectives,” Samarah J. Huk. Kel. dan Huk. Islam, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 317–338, 2024.
M. W. K. Wicitra, W. Wijayanto, and N. R. Herawati, “The Urgency of Establishing an Electoral Judicial Institution as an Effort to Strengthen the Electoral System in Indonesia,” PERSPEKTIF, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 346–355, 2024.
R. Ristawati and R. Salman, “The Role of The Indonesian Constitutional Court in Preventing Social Conflict in A Diverse Society,” Const. Rev., vol. 9, p. 332, 2023.
C. S. Warren, “The Constitutional Court of Indonesia as a Post-Conflict Institution,” Brill’s Asian Law Ser., p. 118, 2024.
L. Judijanto, Z. Zainuddin, and I. Bidja, “Analysis of the Role of the Constitution, Legislature, and Judiciary in Maintaining the Principles of Government Effectiveness in Indonesia,” West Sci. Law Hum. Rights, vol. 2, no. 01, pp. 45–52, 2024.
M. Korycka-Zirk, “Rodzaje testów judicial review a zasada proporcjonalności,” Arch. Filoz. Prawa i Filoz. Społecznej, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 54–69, 2022.
R. A. Cass, “Quality and quantity in constitutional interpretation: the quest for analytic essentials in law,” Eur. J. Law Econ., vol. 46, pp. 183–203, 2018.
M. O. C. Wiguna, “Convergence of Constitutional Interpretation to the Test of Laws Through a Constitutional Dialogue Approach: Konvergensi Penafsiran Konstitusional Terhadap Pengujian Undang-Undang Melalui Pendekatan Constitutional Dialogue,” J. Konstitusi, vol. 20, no. 3, 2023.
M. Babayev and Y. Pudovochkin, “Judicial interpretation of the criminal law: questions of theory,” Vestn. St. Petersbg. Univ. Minist. Intern. Aff. Russ., vol. 2022, no. 4, pp. 78–89, 2022, doi: 10.35750/2071-8284-2022-4-78-89.
S. V Bobrovnyk, “Judicial interpretation: Features and practical significance,” Anthol. Law, vol. 12, pp. 50–57, 2021.
L. L. Leliya, “INDONESIAN STATE LAW IN ITS HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND DEVELOPMENT,” Pena Justisia Media Komun. Dan Kaji. Huk., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 829–845, 2024.
A. Amiruddin and R. Ramadani, “Judicial Activism in Regional Head Election Dispute: The Practice and Consistency of The Indonesian Constitutional Court,” Subst. Justice Int. J. Law, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 56–70, 2023.
F. Zarbiyev, “Judicial activism in international law—a conceptual framework for analysis,” J. Int. Disput. Settl., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 247–278, 2012.
S. Maslul, “Judicial Restraint Dalam Pengujian Kewenangan Judicial Review Di Mahkamah Agung,” J. Yudisial, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 385–403, 2022.
R. R. Phahlevy, A. F. Azhari, K. Wardiono, N. F. Mediawati, and S. B. Purwaningsih, “BALANCING RELIGIOUS TRADITIONS AND LEGAL NEUTRALITY: THE INDEPENDENCE OF INDONESIA’S CONSTITUTIONAL COURT,” Russ. Law J., vol. 11, no. 5S, pp. 209–226, 2023.
A. M. ASRUN and Z. A. HOSSEIN, “EVOLUTION OF INDONESIAN JUDICIARY: FROM STRUGGLE OF INDEPENDENCE TO CRISIS OF ACCOUNTABILITY,” Russ. Law J., vol. 11, no. 2, 2023.
R. Prasetianingsih, “Judicial Activism in Indonesia: Constitutional Culture by the Constitutional Court,” J. Kaji. Ilmu Huk. dan Syariah, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 160–177, 2020.
M. M. Rohman, E. Mark, and K. Maharjan, “The Position of Judges in the Indonesian Legal Idea,” Rechtsnormen J. Law, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 95–104, 2023.
G. Airo-Farulla, “Rationality and judicial review of administrative action.,” Melb. Univ. Law Rev., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 543–575, 2000.
S. K. Bhattarai, “Conceptual Framework of Judicial Review with Reference to Nepal,” Adv. Sci. Humanit., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 52–57, 2023.
J. M. C. Lucio, “El principio de interpretación constitucional conforme a los derechos fundamentales en el control de la ley: Bases teóricas introductorias, de lo abstracto a lo concreto,” Anu. Iberoam. Justicia Const., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 361–387, 2023.
S. B. Prakash and J. C. Yoo, “The origins of judicial review,” U. Chi. L. Rev., vol. 70, p. 887, 2003.
A. Syryt, “Admissibility of judicial review in states with a centralised model of constitutional review–in search of effective means of constitutional protection,” in Constitutionality of Law without a Constitutional Court, Routledge, 2023, pp. 65–81.
R. Rahmawati, A. Madjid, and S. Noedajasakti, “The Submission of Judicial Review by the Public Prosecutor Following the Decision of the Constitutional Court No 20/PUU-XXI/2023 (Indonesia): an Examination of Legal Protection for the Rights of the Convicted,” Path Sci., vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1037–1046, 2023.
H. S. Haq, S. W. A. Pradnyawan, M. T. Rachman, E. Yanto, A. P. Dewi, and J. A. Sybelle, “Legal Reasoning of a Judge’s Dissenting Opinion in the Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 1/PUU-VIII/2010 Against the Judicial Review of Law No. 3 of 1997 on Juvenile Courts,” J. Jurisprud., pp. 250–264, 2022.
A. R. Brown, “75Specificity and Judicial Review,” in The Dead Hand’s Grip: How Long Constitutions Bind States, Oxford University Press, 2022. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780197655283.003.0004.
M. Lutfi, “Portrait of constitutional question mechanisms in judicial review practices in the Constitutional Court from the perspective of prophetic law paradigm,” 2021.
S. E. Asia, “Courts and Diversity,” Court. Divers., 2023, doi: 10.1163/9789004691698.
S. Butt, “Constitutional Court Decision on the Judicial Independence of Other Indonesian Courts,” Const. Rev., vol. 9, p. 247, 2023.
Nining, “Observing the Existence of the Constitutional Court Addresses the Evolving Dynamics and Challenges of the Legal System in Indonesia,” Journal.Sinergi.or.Id, no. 3, pp. 227–234, 2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Irma Putra, Arief Fahmi Lubis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Facebook 
Instagram 
Twitter 
Youtube 
+62 821 1557 5700 
info@westscience-press.com 