Legal Protection for Phishing Victims

Reviewed from Indonesian Positive Law

Authors

  • Olivia Audriana Putri Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta
  • E. Imma Indra Dewi Windajani Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v2i03.1178

Keywords:

Phishing, Legal Protection, Personal Data, Compensation, Lawsuit

Abstract

In this age of digitalization, phishing has become a crime that is close to human life. In phishing crimes, the perpetrator's identity is mostly unknown or anonymous. The perpetrator's identity is the primary key for processing a lawsuit in court. Victims who don’t know the real identity of the phisher will not be able to file a lawsuit for compensation. This study aims to determine the legal protection the state provides to phishing victims, especially in terms of compensation. This research uses a juridical-normative method with data collection through a literature study. Law No. 1 of 2024 on the Second Amendment to Law No. 11 of 2008 regarding Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law), Law No. 27 of 2022 regarding Personal Data Protection (PDP Law), and other constitutional regulations are the primary legal materials in this research. The secondary legal materials are relevant research results, journals, and books. Based on the research conducted, it has been shown that it’s necessary to establish the real identity of the perpetrator who can be responsible for compensating the victims of phishing. The difficulty of finding phishers who can hide their real identities and digital footprints are the main obstacle to compensating phishing victims.

References

T. Y. Rahmanto, “Penegakan Hukum terhadap Tindak Pidana Penipuan Berbasis Transaksi Elektronik,” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 31, 2019, doi: 10.30641/dejure.2019.v19.31-52.

A. W. Laksana, “Pemidanaan Cybercrime dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Positif,” Jurnal Hukum, vol. 35, no. 1, p. 52, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.26532/jh.v35i1.11044.

D. T. Rachmadie and Supanto, “Regulasi Penyimpangan Artificial Intelligence pada Tindak Pidana Malware berdasarkan Undang-Udang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2016,” Deleted Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 128, May 2020, doi: 10.20961/recidive.v9i2.47400.

A. N. Ramadhanti, T. A. Tias, E. D. Lestari, and A. U. Hosnah, “Cara Operasi Kejahatan Phising di Ranah Siber yang Diatur Oleh Hukum Positif Indonesia”, jptam, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1299–1305, Jan. 2024.

S. Tabrani, V. . Safitri, P. A. . Nayla P, and A. U. . Hosnah, “Kejahatan Phishing Ditinjau dari Perspektif Hukum dan Kejahatan Siber”, Civilia, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–13, Jan. 2024.

D. J. K. Negara, “Waspada! Kehajatan Phising Mengintai Anda.” https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/kpknl-purwakarta/baca-artikel/14851/Waspada-Kehajatan-Phising-Mengintai-Anda

I. A. D. Exchange, “Laporan Aktivitas Phishing Domain Periode Q4 2023,” https://idadx.id/

S. Rahardjo, Ilmu Hukum, 8th Edition, Bandung, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014.

A. Priyonggojati, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Penerima Pinjaman Dalam Penyelenggaraan Financial Technology Berbasis Peer To Peer Lending,” JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 162, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.26623/julr.v2i2.2268.

Djarawula, N. M., Alfiani, N. N., & Mayasari, N. H. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Tindak Pidana Kejahatan Teknologi Informasi (Cybercrime) di Indonesia Ditinjau dari Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik. Jurnal Cakrawala Ilmiah, 2(10), 3799–3806. https://doi.org/10.53625/jcijurnalcakrawalailmiah.v2i10.5842

S. Rahardjo, Hukum Progresif: Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Genta Publishing, 2009.

F. E. Muhammad and B. Harefa, “Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Bagi Pelaku Penipuan Phisning Berbasis Web,” JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 226, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.26623/julr.v6i1.6649.

E. A. P. Manurung dan E. F. Thalib, “Tinjauan Yuridis Perlindungan Data Pribadi Berdasarkan Uu Nomor 27 Tahun 2022”, JHS, vol. 4, no. 2, hlm. 139–148, Jan 2023.

A. F. Sutarli and S. Kurniawan, “Peranan Pemerintah Melalui Undang-Undang Perlindungan Data Pribadi dalam Menanggulangi Phising di Indonesia”, Innovative, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 4208–4221, May 2023.

M. Fadli, D. Widijowati, and D. Andayani, “Pencurian Data Pribadi di Dunia Maya (Phising Cybercrime) yang ditinjau dalam Perspektif Kriminologi,” Co-Value Jurnal Ekonomi Koperasi Dan Kewirausahaan, vol. 14, no. 12, May 2024, doi: 10.59188/covalue.v14i11.4335.

A. Adnani, “Penggabungan Ganti Rugi dalam Perkara Perdata Menurut Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia,” Ensiklopedia of Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1–8, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.33559/eoj.v2i3.462.

G. Y. Pramana, “Claim for Damages in Criminal Actions to Achieve Justice for Victims,” Ius Poenale, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 39–50, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.25041/ip.v1i1.2066.

F. T. Wahyuono, “Reformasi Regulasi Penggabungan Gugatan Ganti Kerugian dalam Hukum Acara Pidana,” M. H. thesis, Faculty of Law., Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, 2023.

I. Sari, “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (PMH) dalam Hukum Pidana dan Hukum Perdata,” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, vol. 11, no. 1, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.35968/jh.v11i1.651.

S. Chairunnisa, T. Murwadji, and N. Harrieti, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Nasabah atas Kejahatan Phising dan Hacking pada Layanan Bank Digital Ditinjau Berdasarkan Hukum Positif Indonesia”, Hakim, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 01-16, Dec. 2023.

Asumsi, “Viral Uang Rp110 Juta Milik Nasabah Jenius Raib, Seberapa Aman Bank Digital?” https://asumsi.co/post/61093/viral-uang-rp-110-juta-milik-nasabah-jenius-raib-seberapa-aman-bank-digital/

A. A. Agus and Riskawati. “Penanganan KasusCybercrime Di Kota Makassar (Studi Pada Kantor Kepolisian Resort Kota Besar Makassar).” Jurnal Supremasi, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2016.

Y. Yosefine, R. S. Agustina, and D. Agus, “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Nasabah BTPN Jenius akibat Tindakan Phishing (Studi Kasus Bank Tabungan Pensiunan Nasional Jenius),” Yustisia Tirtayasa Jurnal Tugas Akhir, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 57, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.51825/yta.v3i1.17650.

Y. A. Nugraha and T. Saputra, “Penerapan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Doxing di Indonesia,” Jurnal Hukum Pelita, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–12, May 2024, doi: 10.37366/jh.v5i1.2670.

M. D. Purwandari, “Analisis POLDA Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta dalam Pengungkapan Kasus Phishing,”

S. Ak. Thesis, Faculty of Business and Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, 2024.

S. Mertokusumo, Hukum Acara Pedata Indonesia, Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta, 2021.

D. S. Sinaga and A. Syahputra, “Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Putusan Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard dalam Perkara Gugatan Kurang Pihak,” Jurnal Hukum, vol. 39, no. 1, p. 40, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.26532/jh.v39i1.30696.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-14

How to Cite

Putri, O. A., & Windajani, E. I. I. D. (2024). Legal Protection for Phishing Victims : Reviewed from Indonesian Positive Law. West Science Law and Human Rights, 2(03), 287–296. https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v2i03.1178

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 03 (2024): West Science Law and Human Rights

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Olivia Audriana Putri, E. Imma Indra Dewi Windajani

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.