Analyzing the Historical Evolution, Contemporary Debates, and Global Perspectives on the Death Penalty and its Abolition

Authors

  • Agung Zulfikri Universitas Telkom
  • Supriandi Supriandi Universitas Nusaputra
  • Sabil Mokodenseho Institute Agama Islam Muhammadiyah Kotamobagu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v1i03.136

Keywords:

Bibliometric Analysis , Death Penalty , Capital Punishment , Scholarly Literature , Historical Evolution

Abstract

This research method outlines a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the scholarly literature on the historical evolution, contemporary debates, and global perspectives regarding the death penalty and its abolition. Using bibliometric techniques, this study aims to provide insights into trends, patterns, and influences within this field of research. The method includes selecting relevant databases, search terms, data extraction, and analysis. The results of this bibliometric analysis contribute to a better understanding of the scholarly landscape surrounding the death penalty, facilitating future research and policy decisions on this significant social issue.

References

O. Rafsanjani and A. Mustaffa, “Why Should The Death Penalty Not Be Abolish For Narcotics Crimes? A Case Study In Indonesia,” JIIP-Jurnal Ilm. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 3104–3110, 2022.

C. Babat and Z. Hamin, “When Mothers Kill: Lessons From The English Law For Malaysia,” Eur. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 52.

R. Klementowski, “Financial Crime in the Operational Work of the State Security Service Until 1956–Lower Silesian Perspective,” Stud. Hist. Oeconomicae, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 129–148, 2016.

I. de la R. del Moral, “The Dilemma of the Three Wise Monkeys? Transnational Law as a Tool of Constitutional Interpretation and the US Supreme Court,” Transnatl. Leg. Theory, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 227–257, 2013.

E. Sibly, A Key to Physic, and the Occult Sciences. Cambridge University Press, 2012.

M. S. Esfandiari Bahrasman and A. Javan Jafari Bojnordi, “A Sociological Study of the Evolution of the Death Penalty in Iran and America,” Comp. Law Rev., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2020.

R. R. Tostes, “Death penalty in late-medieval Catalonia. Evidence and significations: by Flocel Sabaté, London, Routledge, 2019, 400 pp, $180 (hbk), ISBN 978-0367188634.” Taylor & Francis, 2021.

E. Viano, “Book Review: The Death Penalty: Perspectives from India & Beyond,” Glob. Adv. Vict. Psychol. Stud., pp. 49–52, 2022.

B. Jones, “Death Penalty Abolition, the Right to Life, and Necessity,” Hum. Rights Rev., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 77–95, 2023.

K. Scott, “Why did China reform its death penalty?,” Pac. Rim L. Pol’y J., vol. 19, p. 63, 2010.

J. S. Liebman, “New Death Penalty Debate: What’s DNA Got to Do with It,” Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev., vol. 33, p. 527, 2001.

B. Liang, “China’s death penalty practice: Working progress, struggle, and challenges within the global abolition movement,” in The death penalty in China: Policy, practice, and reform, Columbia University Press, 2015, pp. 1–30.

J. Derrida, The death penalty, volume II. University of Chicago Press, 2020.

A. N. Gavrilš, “SHOULD THE DEATH PENALTY BE ABOLISHED? ARGUMENTS FOR AND AGAINST THE CENTURIES-OLD PUNISHMENT.,” J. Commun. Cult., vol. 1, no. 2, 2011.

I. Nicolau, “Historical evolution of the death penalty abolition as a fundamental human right,” Contemp. Readings Law Soc. Justice, no. 2, pp. 278–283, 2013.

J.-H. Zhang, S.-Y. Ni, Y.-T. Tan, J. Luo, and S.-C. Wang, “A bibliometric analysis of PIN1 and cell death,” Front. Cell Dev. Biol., vol. 10, p. 1043725, 2022.

Y. Zhou, F. Hu, Y. Cui, H. Wu, S. Hu, and W. Wei, “Bibliometric analysis of research on immunogenic cell death in cancer,” Front. Pharmacol., vol. 13, p. 1029020, 2022.

J. D. Aronson and S. A. Cole, “Science and the death penalty: DNA, innocence, and the debate over capital punishment in the United States,” Law Soc. Inq., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 603–633, 2009.

G. Sween, “Texas Ain’t Tuscany: How a Truism Might Further Invigorate Contemporary Cost Arguments for Death-Penalty Abolition,” Am. J. Crim. L., vol. 41, p. 151, 2013.

S. Perseil, “From Prison to the Death Penalty: Human Rights Violations in the War on Drugs,” in Living with Drugs, Elsevier, 2020, pp. 157–164.

L. Sina, “Implementation of the Death Penalty in the Perspective of Human Rights in Indonesia,” Hasanuddin Law Rev., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 385–397, 2016.

M. N. Sitompul and A. Sitompul, “Execution Of Death Penalty In Narcotics Crime In The Perspective Of National Law In Indonesia,” Int. Asia Law Money Laund., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 107–112, 2022.

F. D. Boateng and M. K. Dzordzormenyoh, “Capital punishment in Brazil: Exploring factors that predict public support for the death penalty,” J. Contemp. Crim. Justice, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 56–71, 2022.

S. I. Kuzina, T. P. Cherkasova, O. A. Artyukhin, N. V Saraev, and D. S. Comartov, “Political-legal issues of fulfillment of russia’s international obligations on death penalty abolition in the country,” Rev. Gênero e Direito, vol. 9, no. S3, pp. 178–200, 2020.

D. C. Baldus, G. Woodworth, and C. A. Pulaski, Equal justice and the death penalty: A legal and empirical analysis. Upne, 1990.

H. A. Bedau, The death penalty in America. Oxford University Press, 1998.

W. Schabas, The abolition of the death penalty in international law. Cambridge University Press, 2002.

N. Vidmar and P. Ellsworth, “Public opinion and the death penalty,” Stan. L. Rev., vol. 26, p. 1245, 1973.

S. Lippens, G. Denecker, P. Ovaere, P. Vandenabeele, and W. Declercq, “Death penalty for keratinocytes: apoptosis versus cornification,” Cell Death Differ., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1497–1508, 2005.

M. L. Radelet and M. J. Borg, “The changing nature of death penalty debates,” Annu. Rev. Sociol., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 43–61, 2000.

E. Van den Haag and J. P. Conrad, The death penalty: A debate. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.

D. Markel, “State, be not proud: A retributivist defense of the commutation of death row and the abolition of the death penalty,” Harv. CR-CLL Rev., vol. 40, p. 407, 2005.

J. D. Bessler, “Revisiting Beccaria’s Vision: The Enlightenment, America’s Death Penalty, and the Abolition Movement,” Nw. JL Soc. Pol’y, vol. 4, p. 195, 2009.

M. Idris, E. Willya, I. Wekke, and S. Mokodenseho, “Peace resolution in education and application on information and communication technologhy,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol., vol. 29, no. 6, 2021.

I. S. Wekke and S. Mokodenseho, “Religious Teaching and Learning in Minority Muslim of Manado Indonesia BT - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education, Science, and Technology (ICEST 2017),” Sep. 2017, pp. 187–189. doi: 10.2991/icest-17.2017.62.

S. Naim and S. Mokodenseho, “Indonesia’s Foreign Policy in Promoting a Moderate Islamic Identity after the Reform,” AT-TURAS J. Stud. Keislam., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2023.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-31

How to Cite

Zulfikri, A., Supriandi, S., & Mokodenseho, S. (2023). Analyzing the Historical Evolution, Contemporary Debates, and Global Perspectives on the Death Penalty and its Abolition. West Science Law and Human Rights, 1(03), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v1i03.136

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 03 (2023): West Science Law and Human Rights

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Agung Zulfikri, Supriandi, Sabil Mokodenseho

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.