Comparative Analysis on the Improvement of Aggravate Punishment for Recidivism in Malaysia

Authors

  • Yichen Pan University of Malaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v1i04.196

Keywords:

Aggravate punishment , Recidivism , Comparative analysis , Criminal justice system , Improvement

Abstract

Recidivism, the fact that individuals re-offend after being convicted of a crime, is a significant challenge faced by criminal justice systems worldwide. The study will begin by reviewing relevant literature and legal frameworks pertaining to recidivism and aggravated punishment in Malaysia. The analysis will delve into the objectives, principles, and legal provisions that guide the application of aggravated punishment for repeat offenders in the Malaysian criminal justice system. Additionally, a comparative perspective will be adopted to examine the experiences and practices of other jurisdictions that have implemented similar punitive measures for recidivism. This comparative analysis delves into the strategies employed by Malaysia for the improvement of aggravated punishment concerning recidivism within its criminal justice system. Malaysia, like many countries, has adopted measures to address but leaves several concerns on this issue. Those concerns include the range of defining recidivism unreasonably and focusing too much on crimes that violate property and the discretion of judges for sentencing them are so huge. The study evaluates Malaysia's approach to aggravated punishment for recidivism by examining the legal framework, and sentencing guidelines, and also focuses on the rights of offenders. Furthermore, it compares Malaysia's practices with those of other nations including both civil law and common law countries to identify best practices and potential areas for enhancement. By employing a comparative research methodology, the study will explore the strengths and weaknesses of the aggravated punishment approach in deterring recidivism, ensuring public safety, and promoting rehabilitation. It will critically evaluate the legal and ethical considerations associated with imposing harsher penalties on repeat offenders, including questions of proportionality, fairness, and human rights implications. Ultimately, the study strives to provide several potential ways to address those concerns for enhancing the Malaysian criminal justice system's response to recidivism, considering the principles of proportionality, and fairness in criminal justice.

References

Austin Lovegrove 2004 Sentencing the Multiple Offender: Judicial Practice and Legal Principle

AZMAN v. PP [CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.: JB-42S-7-08/2019]

Drápal, J. (2023). Sentencing multiple conviction offenders. European journal of criminology, 20(1), 142-160.

Harmohan Deb Nath v Jaha Baksha Patwari AIR 1943 Cal 25

Kasman, Nicole Marie.(2018)."Do We Own Our Bodies: The Legality of Body Ownership"https://digitalcommons.augustana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context=biolstudent

NORHADI MINHAT lwn. PP[JA-42 JSKH-1-07/2019]

Professor Dr M K Majid &T M Abdul Rashid. (2010). The courts in Malaysia and their jurisdiction.

public Prosecutor v Asri Che din [2018] MLRHU 973

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v GOVINDNAN A/L CHINDEN NAIR, [1998] 2 MLJ 181

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v GOVINDNAN A_L CHINDEN NAIR, [1998] 2 MLJ 181

Schoeman, M. (2010). Recidivism: A conceptual and operational conundrum. Acta Criminologica: African Journal of Criminology & Victimology, 2010(sed-1), 80-94.

Selvaraj a/l Ganesu v Public Prosecutor [2020] MLJU 2365

TAMILVANAN THAYSING lwn. PP.MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA.KLANG/NORLIZA OTHMAN PK.[RAYUAN JENAYAH NO: BA-42S-12-02/2020].26 APRIL 2021

Weisberg, R. (2013). Meanings and measures of recidivism. S. Cal. L. Rev., 87, 785.

Weisberg, R. (2013). Meanings and measures of recidivism. S. Cal. L. Rev., 87, 785.

Zamble, E., & Quinsey, V. L. (2001). The criminal recidivism process. Cambridge university press.

Zamble, E., & Quinsey, V. L. (2001). The criminal recidivism process. Cambridge university press.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-30

How to Cite

Pan, Y. (2023). Comparative Analysis on the Improvement of Aggravate Punishment for Recidivism in Malaysia. West Science Law and Human Rights, 1(04), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v1i04.196