Ethical Dilemmas in the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (Addressing Issues of Bias, Transferability, and Patient Trust in Breast Cancer AI)

Authors

  • Priscilla Auleader Napitupulu Bandung Institute of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v1i04.314

Keywords:

Breast cancer diagnosis, Artificial Intelligence, Bias, Preventive Surveillance, Legal Liability

Abstract

Breast cancer care is becoming one of the main areas of development of artificial intelligence (AI), with applications including screening and diagnosis, risk calculation, disease progression, clinical decision support, management planning, and precision medicine. This paper will review the ethical, legal, and social implications of these developments, including the values embedded in algorithms, evaluation of results, issues of bias, data ownership, confidentiality, and consent, as well as legal, moral, and professional responsibilities. Additionally, we also need to consider the potential impact on patients, including trust in healthcare, as well as explaining the reasons why AI is being implemented quickly. Resolving this challenge requires the involvement of professionals, governments and regulators, health care providers, and patients, regarding the imposition of conditions on implementation, and preventive monitoring systems to ensure development does not move too quickly ahead of evaluation and discussion.

References

​​[1]A. Čartolovni, A. Tomičić, and E. Lazić Mosler, “Ethical, legal, and social considerations of AI-based medical decision-support tools: A scoping review,” International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 161, p. 104738, May 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104738.

S. Legg and M. Hutter, “A collection of definitions of intelligence,” Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 157, 2007.

N. Houssami, G. Kirkpatrick-Jones, N. Noguchi, and C. I. Lee, “Artificial intelligence (AI) for the early detection of breast cancer: a scoping review to assess AI’s potential in breast screening practice,” Expert Rev Med Devices., vol. 16, 2019, doi: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1610387.

Y. Jiang, C. Wang, and S. Zhou, “Artificial intelligence-based risk stratification, accurate diagnosis and treatment prediction in gynecologic oncology,” Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 96, pp. 82–99, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2023.09.005.

“Culture and Ethics Resource Centre - Definitions - Bluestone Edge.” https://www.bluestoneedge.com/culture-and-ethics-resource-centre/culture-and-ethics-resource-centre-definitions/ (accessed Oct. 26, 2023).

T. K. Greaker, I. Aune, and S. K. Grudt, “Ethical challenges and reflection. Norwegian bachelor students’ experiences during clinical placement in Sub-Saharan Africa,” International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences, vol. 19, p. 100633, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijans.2023.100633.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-30

How to Cite

Napitupulu, P. A. (2023). Ethical Dilemmas in the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (Addressing Issues of Bias, Transferability, and Patient Trust in Breast Cancer AI). West Science Law and Human Rights, 1(04), 235–239. https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v1i04.314