Analysis of Conflicting Regulations concerning the Food Estate Program and Customary Land in Accordance to Indonesian Customary Law Principles

Authors

  • Ariel Guslandi Parahyangan Catholic University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v1i04.326

Keywords:

Customary rights, Indonesia, Food estate, Land, Plantation

Abstract

As a rechstaat, Indonesia has human rights and a law protection guarantee that is regulated in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD 1945). To ensure the protection of the law and human rights, it is necessary to have a legal basis that regulates these matters, including customary rights. The regulations of customary rights are regulated in Article 18B paragraph 2 of the UUD 1945, Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning the Basic Regulation of Agrarian Principles, Law Number 39 of 2014 concerning Plantation, and Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning Job Creation. However, there is a problem in the social field, as happened in Central Kalimantan Province that customary land was turned into a 600-hectare cassava plantation food estate program without involving Dayak indigenous people from planning to implementation. Moreover, Dayak indigenous people do not get any benefits from the food estate program. These reasons are that there are a few legal problems that contradict the food estate program and customary rights.

Author Biography

Ariel Guslandi, Parahyangan Catholic University

Studied at the Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University (2019-2023). My expertise is regarding agrarian law and my interest in conducting research regarding customary rights on the land. Email: arielguslandi@gmail.com

References

Q. Pasaribu. "Food Estate: Perkebunan Singkong Mangkrak, Ribuan Hektare Sawah tak Kunjung Panen di Kalteng". BBC.com. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/c2ez8gm679qo (accessed Oct. 24, 2023).

M. Idris. "Kontroversi Food Estate, Babat Hutan Kalimantan Demi Kebun Singkong". Kompas.com. https://money.kompas.com/read/2023/08/16/164024626/kontroversi-food-estate-babat-hutan-kalimantan-demi-kebun-singkong?page=all (accessed Oct. 24, 2023).

Divisi Humas & Protokoler. "Guru Besar UNPAR Paparkan Kondisi Food Estate di Indonesia Beserta Alternatifnya". Unpar.ac.id. https://unpar.ac.id/guru-besar-unpar-paparkan-kondisi-food-estate-di-indonesia-beserta-alternatifnya/#:~:text=Food%20Estate%20sendiri%20merupakan%20usaha,ada%20di%20Undang%2DUndang%20Kehutanan (accessed Oct. 25, 2023).

M. P. Artha. "Tanah Ulayat". Hukumonline.com. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/tanah-ulayat-cl6522/ (accessed Oct. 25, 2023).

C. D. Wulansari, "Asas Pokok Hukum Adat," in Hukum Adat Indonesia Suatu Pengantar, Indonesia: Refika Aditama , 2018, pp. 80.

Ridwan, "Negara Hukum dan Hukum Administrasi Negara," in Hukum Administrasi Negara, Indonesia: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2018, pp. 2-6.

B. Harsono, "Pendahuluan," in Hukum Agraria Indonesia Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria, Isi, dan Pelaksanaannya, Indonesia: Universitas Trisakti, 2013, pp. 18-19.

Subekti and Tjitrosudibio, "Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria," in Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, Indonesia: Balai Pustaka, 2014, pp. 513-536.

J. Asshiddiqie, "Prinsip Ketuhanan, Kemanusiaan, dan Keadulan," in Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia, Indonesia: Sinar Grafika, 2018, pp. 84-92.

A. Wirapranatha, Y. Sutrasna, and L. Simbolon, "Strategi Pengembangan Food Estate dalam Pemulihan Ekonomi Nasional", Jurnal Ekonomi Pertahanan., Vol. 8, No.1, pp. 1-13, 2022.

R. Diffa, Imamulhadi, and S. Sekarwati, "Analisis Yuridis terhadap Program Pembangunan Food Estate di Kawasan Hutan Ditinjau dari Eco-Justice", Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Tata Ruang dan Agraria., Vol.2, No.1, pp. 42-62, 2022.

Sulastriyono and S.D.F.Aristya, "Penerapan Norma dan Asas-Asas Hukum Adat dalam Praktik Peradilan Perdata", Mimbar Hukum., Vol. 24, No.1, pp. 25-40, 2012.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-30

How to Cite

Guslandi, A. (2023). Analysis of Conflicting Regulations concerning the Food Estate Program and Customary Land in Accordance to Indonesian Customary Law Principles . West Science Law and Human Rights, 1(04), 263–270. https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v1i04.326