Public domain as an antidote conception to efforts to protect traditional cultural expressions (TCEs)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v2i02.724Keywords:
Intellectual Property Right, Public Domain, Traditional Cultural ExpressionsAbstract
This paper analyzes how the public domain conception applied in the provisions of Intellectual Property Rights is used by foreign parties in an attempt to hinder the protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions (TCEs) in a country, because of the potential economic benefits resulting from their use, this condition is clearly very vulnerable to misappropriation committed by foreign parties, destruction of cultural values, and exploitation. This study also aims to find out how countries, especially Indonesia, provide protection for Traditional Cultural Expressions. Because of the importance of protecting Traditional Cultural Expressions, doctrinal and comparative research is directed at finding problem solvers. After conducting research, the public domain should not be placed on Traditional Cultural Expressions because it would violate the secret character of many intangible, sacred, and secret elements that living things have to cultural heritage and would highlight the deterioration and unauthorized appropriation of cultural values. And some countries have regulated the protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions in different ways through IPR regimes or sui generis. However, there is a need for a model law in the form of collective agreements between countries to protect Traditional Cultural Expressions owned by indigenous peoples or owning communities.
References
The WIPO Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore, 2023.
P. H. Purwandoko, “The Implementation of the Traditional Cultural Expressions (TCE) Protection in Indonesia Based on Article 38 Law Number 28 of 2014 regarding Copyright,” Indonesian Journal of Internastional Law, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 550-551, 2021.
K. Roisah, “Perlindungan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Dalam Sistem Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual,” Masalah-Masalah Hukum E-Journal UNDIP, vol. 43, no. 3, p. 373, 2014.
Y. E. Widyanti, “Perlindungan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Indonesia dalam Sistem yang sui generis,” Arena Hukum, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 389, 2020.
A. Sardjono, Hak Kekayaan Intelektual & Pengetahuan Tradisional : Suatu Telaah Teoritis, Depok: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2021.
T. T. Ochoa, “Origins and Meaning of the Public Domain,” University of Dayton Law Review, vol. 28, no. 2, p. 216, 2022.
World Intellectual Property Organization, Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore, Geneve: Eleventh Sessions, July 3 to 12 2007WIPO/GRTKF/1C/11/15.
I. C. o. I. P. a. G. R. T. K. a. F. World Intellectual Property Organization, Geneva, 2010. WIPO/GRTKF/IC/17/INF/8.
R. Awopetu, “In Defense of Culture: Protection Traditional Cultural Expressions in Intellectual Property,” Emory Law Journal, vol. 69, no. 4, p. 754, 2020.
D. I. Susanti, R. I. M. Sudhiarsa dan R. Susrijani, Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional & Hak Kekayaan Intelektual, Malang: Sinar Grafika, 2019.
B. Kesowo, Pengantar Pemahaman Konsepsi Dasar Sekitar Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual (HAKI), Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2021.
Muhaimin, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Mataram: Mataram University Press, 2020.
Suteki dan G. Taufani, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum: Filsafat Teori dan Praktik, Depok: Rajawali Press, 2020.
S. Soekanto dan S. Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Jakarta: CV. Rajawali, 1986.
S. Soekanto dan S. Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Jakarta: UI Press, 2007, p. 52.
T. E. Union, “Piagam Ranah Public (public domain) Europeana,” 2010. [Online]. Available: https://pro.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/IPR/Public%20Domain%20Charter/BAHASA%20INDO. [Diakses 11 November 2023].
R. L. Okediji, “Traditional Knowledge and the Public Domain,” 2018.
M. A. D. Putra, “Perlindungan Hak Cipta Penerbit terhadap Buku Ciptaan yang telah Menjadi Public Domain,” Journal of Intellectual Property, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 87, 2020.
World Intellectual Property Organization, Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore, Geneve: Eleventh Sessions, March 15 to 19 2004.
T. H. Simatupang, “Initiating the Concept of Sui Generis of the Legal Protection of Communal Intellectual Property in the Philosophy of Science Perspective,” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, vol. 22, no. 2, p. 245, 2022.
A. Atsar, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pengetahuan dan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional untuk Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemajuan Kebudayaan dan Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta,” Jurnal Law Reform, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 285, 2017.
D. P. B. Asri, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kebudayaan Melalui World Heritage Centre UNESCO,” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 257-258, 2018.
M. Hawin dan B. A. Riswandi, Isu-Isu Penting Hak Kekayaan Intelektual di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2018.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis”, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2016 Nomor 252, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 tentang Paten, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2016 Nomor 176, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5922.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 29 Tahun 2000 tentang Perlindungan Varietas Tanaman, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2000 Nomor 241, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4043.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 266, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5599.
D. P. Asri, “Perlindungan Hukum Preventif Terhadap Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta,” Journal of Intellectual Property, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 17, 2018.
K. D. Febriantini, “Perlindungan Hukum Internasional Terhadap Warisan Budaya Indonesia yang di Klaim oleh Negara Lain,” Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 206, 2022.
I. N. Cahyana dan A. Sabirin, “Optimizing of the Protection of Cultural Expressions of Indigenous People in Indonesia,” Jurnal Kebijakan Hukum, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 214, 2023.
C. i. T. US, “Languange, Traditions, People, Customs & Etiquettees,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://leapscholar.com/blog/culture-in-us-language-traditions-people-customs-etiquettes/. [Diakses 06 November 2023].
A. Bussey, “Traditional Cultural Expressions and the U.S Constitution,” Buffalo Intellectual Property Law Journal, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 3, 2014.
B. o. Reclamation, “The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.usbr.gov/nagpra/. [Diakses 11 November 2023].
A. a. T. S. I. H. P. Act, “Australian Government ComLaw,” 1984. [Online]. Available: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2010C00807. [Diakses 10 November 2023].
Britanica, “Culture Life,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.britannica.com/place/Panama/Cultural-life. [Diakses 12 November 2023].
P. Figueroa, “When Imitation is Not Flattery: Addressing Cultural Exploitation in Guatemala Through a Sui Generis Model,” Bringham Young University Law Review, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 1003-1006, 2021.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Thamrin Arthata Hutajulu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Facebook 
Instagram 
Twitter 
Youtube 
+62 821 1557 5700 
info@westscience-press.com 