Analysis of Factors Influencing the Transformation of the Workforce from the Agricultural Sector to the Non-Agricultural Sector in Bagik Polak Village, West Lombok Regency

Authors

  • Sumarni Puspawati Universitas Mataram
  • Akung Daeng Universitas Mataram
  • Gusti Ayu Arini Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wsnt.v2i02.993

Keywords:

Income, Education, Age and Gender

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of income, education, age and gender on the transformation of the workforce from the agricultural sector to the non-agricultural sector in Bagik Polak Village. The type of research used in this study is the associative quantitative method. The test was carried out on 94 respondents spread across 7 hamlets, namely Karang buncu lauq, Karang buncu Barat, Karang buncu daye, Rerot, Karang kebon timur, Karang kebon Barat and Enjak. Data was obtained by distributing questionnaires and sampling research using the purposive sampling method. The analysis tool used is logistic regression (logit) which has three tests including Assessing the Overall Model Fit, Testing the Feasibility of the Regression Model (Goodness of Fit Test) and Determination Coefficient (Nagelkerke's R Square). As well as statistical tests, namely  the Likelihood Ratio Test (Simultaneous Test F) and the Wald Test (Partial Test t). The results of the analysis show that purely of the four variables used in this study, there are two variables that have a positive and significant effect, namely income with a significant value of 0.045< 0.05; and education with a significant value of 0.019 < 0.05. Meanwhile, the age variables with a significant value of 0.796 > 0.05 and gender with a significant value of 0.851 > 0.05 did not have a significant effect on the transformation of the workforce from the agricultural sector to the non-agricultural sector in Bagik Polak Village. Meanwhile, simultaneously that together, the independent variable (X) has an effect on the transformation of the workforce from the agricultural sector to the non-agricultural sector with a significant chi-square value of 0.004 < 0.05. Meanwhile, Nagelkerke's R2 value shows that all independent variables are able to explain the dependent variable by 42.7% and the remaining 57.3% are explained by other variables that are not included in the model.

References

Andriaty, E., Sankarto, B. S., & Setyorini, E. (2011). Kajian kebutuhan informasi teknologi pertanian di beberapa kabupaten di Jawa. Jurnal Perpustakaan Pertanian, 20(2), 54-61.

Arikunto, S. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Penelitian dan Penilaian Program. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Arvianti, E. Y., Asnah, A., & Prasetyo, A. (2017). Minat pemuda tani terhadap transformasi sektor pertanian di Kabupaten Ponorogo. Buana sains, 15(2), 181-188.

Ayer, J. E., Pangemanan, L. R., & Rori, Y. P. (2016). Pengaruh Motivasi Dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerjapegawai Pada Dinas Pertanian Kabupaten Supiori. Agri-SosioEkonomi, 12(3A), 27-46.

Benu, N. M., & Moniaga, V. R. (2016). Dampak ekonomi dan sosial alih fungsi lahan pertanian hortikultura menjadi kawasan wisata Bukit Rurukan di Kecamatan Tomohon Timur, Kota Tomohon. Agri-Sosioekonomi, 12(3), 113-124.

Febrianti, V. P., Permata, T. A., Humairoh, M., Putri, O. M., Amelia, L., Fatimah, S., & Khastini, R. O. (2021). Analisis Pengaruh Perkembangan Teknologi Pertanian Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 Terhadap Hasil Produksi padi. Jurnal Pengolahan Pangan, 6(2), 54-60.

Gultom, I. A., Puspa, A. K., Dharmawan, Y. Y., & Subing, A. (2020). Analisis perencanaan sektor pertanian berbasis korporasi. VISIONIST, 9(2).

Lumintang, F. M. (2013). Analisis Pendapatan Petani Padi Di Desa Teep Kecamatan Langowan Timur. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 1(3).

Mukti, G. W., Andriani, R., & Pardian, P. (2018). Transformasi petani menjadi entrepreneur (studi kasus pada program wirausaha muda pertanian di fakultas pertanian universitas padjadjaran). Agricore: Jurnal Agribisnis dan Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Unpad, 3(2).

Muslich, M. Efisiensi Pemasaran Jambu Mete di Kabupaten Lombok Barat (Studi Kasus di Sentra Produksi Bayan). Jurnal WACANA, 12(1), 39953.

Pantow, S., Palar, S., & Wauran, P. (2015). Analisis potensi unggulan dan daya saing sub sektor Pertanian di Kabupaten Minahasa. Jurnal Berkala Ilmiah Efisiensi, 15(4).

Pasaribu, E., Anitasari, M., Gunawan, R., Ekaputr, R. A., & Putri, N. T. (2020). Analisis Shift Share pada Transformasi Sektor Pertanian dalam Perekonomian Wilayah di Bengkulu. Jurnal Ekonomi-Qu, 10(2), 129-144.

Prihandini, N. A., Supriyadi, S., & Arifin, Z. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Pemecahan Tanah Pertanian Kurang Dari Batas Minimum Kepemilikan Tanah Pertanian Karena Pewarisan Di Kabupaten Pati. Semarang Law Review, 2, 190-202.

Priyatna, A., Rahayu, D., & Saipudin, S. (2022). Analisis Transformasi Ekonomi Sektor Pertanian Antar Provinsi Di Pulau Kalimantan. Jurnal Syntax Transformation, 3(01), 16-30.

Safrika, S., & Husna, N. (2021). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Transformasi Tenaga Kerja Wanita Dari Pertanian Keindustri Kerajinan Kupiah Meukeutop Di Kecamatan Indrajaya Kabupaten Pidie. Jurnal Agroristek, 4(1), 25-30.

Syarifudin, A. (2020). Tren demografi dan pengaruhnya terhadap pendidikan. Jurnal Jendela Bunda Program Studi PG-PAUD Universitas Muhammadiyah Cirebon, 8(1), 32-48.

Yuniati, M., Amini, R., & Ihsan, I. (2022). Analisis Dampak Transformasi Struktural Terhadap Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Di Kabupaten Lombok Tengah Nusa Tenggara Barat. KOLONI, 1(4), 178-184.

Ghozali, Imam. 2006. Analisis Multivariat Dengan Program SPSS. Semarang : Badan Penerbit UNDIP.

Ghozali, Imam. 2007. Analisis Multivariat Dengan Program SPSS. Semarang : Badan Penerbit UNDIP.

Gujarati, Damodar dan Porter, Down C. 2009. Basic Econometric. Edisi ke-5

Downloads

Published

2024-06-28

How to Cite

Puspawati, S., Daeng , A., & Arini , G. A. (2024). Analysis of Factors Influencing the Transformation of the Workforce from the Agricultural Sector to the Non-Agricultural Sector in Bagik Polak Village, West Lombok Regency . West Science Nature and Technology, 2(02), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsnt.v2i02.993