Cultural Transformation through Digitalization: A Bibliometric Approach in Responding to Changes in Social Values, Norms, and Cultural Practices in Society
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wsshs.v2i08.1214Keywords:
Digitalization, Bibliometric Analysis, Cultural Transformation, Covid-19Abstract
This study employs VOSviewer to conduct a bibliometric analysis and visualize the intricate research landscape surrounding the themes of digitalization, cultural transformation, organizational practices, and the impact of global crises like the COVID-19 pandemic. Through a series of network density maps, the research identifies key thematic concentrations and academic collaborations over recent years. It reveals how digitalization intersects with various societal dimensions, influencing education, cultural heritage, sustainability, and business practices. The analysis emphasizes the role of digital technologies in facilitating significant social and organizational changes, advocating for policies that enhance digital literacy and inclusivity. Additionally, the examination of authorship networks sheds light on influential scholars and collaborative dynamics, providing insights that can guide future research directions. The study underscores the necessity for adaptive business models that integrate sustainability and resilience, crucial for navigating contemporary and future challenges.
References
M. D. Smith, “CALL in a social context: reflecting on digital equity, identity, and interaction in the post-COVID age,” Qual. Assur. Educ., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 537–549, 2021.
M. W. Johnson, E. A. Suvorova, and A. A. Karelina, “Digitalization and Uncertainty in the University: Coherence and collegiality through a metacurriculum,” Postdigital Sci. Educ., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 772–792, 2022.
E. Turban, J. Outland, D. King, J. K. Lee, T.-P. Liang, and D. C. Turban, Electronic commerce 2018: a managerial and social networks perspective, vol. 2017. Springer, 2018.
G. Baxter and I. Sommerville, “Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering,” Interact. Comput., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 4–17, 2011.
H. Jenkins, Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. The MIT press, 2009.
K. Lewin, “Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change,” Hum. relations, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5–41, 1947.
M. Castells, Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
G. Hofstede, “The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories,” J. Int. Bus. Stud., vol. 14, pp. 75–89, 1983.
A. Warde, “Consumption and theories of practice,” J. Consum. Cult., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 131–153, 2005.
D. Buckingham, Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
P. Dunleavy, H. Margetts, S. Bastow, and J. Tinkler, “New public management is dead—long live digital-era governance,” J. public Adm. Res. theory, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 467–494, 2006.
J. E. Fountain, Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Rowman & Littlefield, 2004.
H. J. Gans, Popular culture and high culture: An analysis and evaluation of taste. Basic books, 2008.
M. Castells, “Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society1,” Br. J. Sociol., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 5–24, 2000.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Loso Judijanto, Mei Rani Amalia, Arief Fahmi Lubis, Weda Febriyanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.