Social Engineering and Legal Framework for Drug Rehabilitation: A Comparative Analysis of National Legislation in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58812/wsshs.v2i11.1471Keywords:
Drug Rehabilitation, Legal Framework, Social Engineering, IndonesiaAbstract
Drug addiction poses a significant challenge to public health, social stability, and legal systems worldwide. This study examines Indonesia’s legal framework for drug rehabilitation through a juridical analysis and compares it with international best practices, focusing on Portugal and Switzerland. Findings reveal that while Indonesia’s Law No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics incorporates rehabilitation, implementation gaps, inconsistent legal applications, and societal stigma hinder its effectiveness. Comparative analysis highlights the success of health-centered approaches and community-based programs in other countries. This paper underscores the importance of legal reforms, socio-cultural adaptability, and social engineering in enhancing drug rehabilitation policies in Indonesia. Recommendations include clearer legal guidelines, enhanced rehabilitation infrastructure, and public awareness initiatives to foster systemic change.
References
L. Manurung, “The Impact of Drug Abuse on Families and Society (Literature Review),” MSJ Major. Sci. J., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 239–244, 2024.
J. Dua, “The problem of drug addiction in india: Its consequences and effective measures,” J. Drug Deliv. Ther., vol. 12, no. 1-S, pp. 159–163, 2022.
A. Żółtaszek, “THE GLOBAL PANDEMIC OF YOUTH’S ADDICTION AND ITS SOCIO-ECONOMIC BURDEN.,” Polityka Spoleczna, vol. 604, no. 9, 2024.
P. S. - and M. T. -, “Causes Of Rising Drug Trafficking In India And Ways To Stop Drug Trafficking,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Res., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2024, doi: 10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i02.14548.
H. R. Wani and A. Ahmed, “A Qualitative Study of the Initiation, Causes, and Consequences of Drug Addiction,” J. Ment. Heal. Hum. Behav., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 10–15, 2024.
A. Renata and W. S. Myharto, “The Application of Rehabilitation Sentences for Narcotics Addicts (Case Study of North Jakarta District Court Decision Number 115/Pid. Sus/2023/PN Jkt. Utr),” 2024.
Z. Zulfahmi, “Comparison of Criminal Sanctions for Drugs Abusers in Indonesian Positive Law and Islamic Law,” J. Sharia Leg. Sci., vol. 2, pp. 178–193, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.61994/jsls.v2i2.646.
A. W. Laksana and B. Sobirov, “Comparative Study of Criminal Law Enforcement Against Drug Addicts Through Religious Rehabilitation Between Indonesia and Uzbekistan,” MADANIA J. Kaji. Keislam., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 159–166, 2024.
S. Pulungan, E. Soponyono, and S. Purnomo, “Reforming Indonesia’s Approach to Narcotics Offenses: A Call for Rehabilitation over Incarceration,” South East. Eur. J. Public Heal., pp. 249–253, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.70135/seejph.vi.1473.
D. Muslim, N. Darwis, and S. Sudarto, “Legal Study Analysis of Criminal Law Policy in the Implementation of Integrated Assessment for Drug Abusers based on Law Number 35 of 2009 Concerning Narcotics,” 2024.
K. S. J. Linus and H. B. K. Hutasoi, “Penyembuhan dan Pencegahan pada Kecanduan Narkoba dan Zat Adiktif: Sebuah Tinjauan Pustaka,” MAHESA Malahayati Heal. Student J., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 494–502, 2023.
F. Handayani and L. Angrayni, “Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure,” 2024.
T. Y. Chandra, J. Sriwidodo, and M. S. Tumanggor, “Rehabilitation of Narcotic Addictives: An Overview of Implementation and The Effort by Restorative Justice,” KRTHA BHAYANGKARA, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 465–480, 2023.
M. A. Syaifudin, A. Sulaiman, and V. R. Multiwijaya, “Implementation of The Rehabilitation Model on Victims of Drug Abuse in The Development of The Legal System in Indonesia,” Interdiciplinary J. Hummanity, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 285–295, 2023.
C. Jaya and F. Hikmah, “Legal Reform on Rehabilitation for Drug Users as an Ultimum Remedium Effort,” J. USM LAW Rev., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 364–375, 2024.
B. J. P. R. H. Siahaan, “Cultural Research on Drug Users in Indonesia,” JIM J. Ilm. Mhs. Pendidik. Sej., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 679–685, 2024.
P. Tanguay et al., “Facilitating a transition from compulsory detention of people who use drugs towards voluntary community-based drug dependence treatment and support services in Asia,” Harm Reduct. J., vol. 12, pp. 1–5, 2015.
A. Schloenhardt, Legalisation and Decriminalisation of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances. Carl Grossmann Verlag, 2022.
A. Ahmad, A. Kamarulzaman, M. Kazatchkine, R. Dreifuss, and H. Clark, “The 67th UN CND—upholding human rights in drug policy,” Lancet, vol. 403, no. 10439, pp. 1851–1852, 2024.
V. Stein, International Law and Legalisation and Decriminalisation of Illicit Drugs, vol. 9. buch & netz, 2024.
W. C. Warih and E. F. Setiawan, “IMPLEMENTATION OF SOCIAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM POLICY FOR NARCOTICS INMATE (CASE STUDY PURWOKERTO CLASS IIB NARCOTICS PRISON),” J. Soc. Polit. Gov., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 61–75, 2024.
A. Qourrichi, “Social influence and the formation of social norms, a psychosocial approach,” Soc. Influ. Form. Soc. Norms, a Psychosoc. Approach| IUSRJ, vol. 4, 2023.
P. Georgakas, “Truth and lies about the social rehabilitation of drug addiction,” Ann. Gen. Psychiatry, vol. 9, no. Suppl 1, p. S20, 2009.
A.-M. Kennedy and A. Parsons, “Social engineering and social marketing: why is one ‘good’ and the other ‘bad’?,” J. Soc. Mark., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 198–209, 2014.
P. W. Schultz, “Secret agents of influence: Leveraging social norms for good,” Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 443–450, 2022.
P. Benjamim, L. Prada, A. RODRIGUES LOPES, R. Avó-Baião, and D. Caldeira, “A Reconciliação da Medicação nos Cuidados de Saúde em Portugal.,” Acta Med. Port., vol. 37, 2024.
K. Hill, K. Dunham, K. Doneski, K. L. Sue, K. Thakarar, and J. Butner, “In Support of the Decriminalization of Personal Drug and Paraphernalia Use and Possession: Position Statement of AMERSA, Inc (Association for Multidisciplinary Education, Research, Substance Use and Addiction),” Substance Use & Addiction Journal. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, p. 29767342241277620, 2024.
T. Lancet, “Drug decriminalisation: grounding policy in evidence,” Lancet (London, England), vol. 402, no. 10416. p. 1941, 2023.
A. Finucane and J. M. Stritch, “Connecting the Person by Removing the Stigma: Why Ireland Should Follow the Portuguese Model of Drug Decriminalisation,” South East. Eur. J. Public Heal., 2023.
H. DAGMAR, “Chapter 11: Drug consumption facilities in Europe and beyond,” Harm Reduct. evidence, impacts challenges, 2010.
A. Uchtenhagen, “Harm reduction: The case of Switzerland,” Eur. Addict. Res., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 86–91, 1995.
K. R. Fisher and C. Purcal, “Policies to change attitudes to people with disabilities,” Scand. J. Disabil. Res., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 161–174, 2017.
T. L. Anderson and F. Ripullo, “Social setting, stigma management, and recovering drug addicts,” Humanity Soc., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 25–43, 1996.
P. W. Corrigan, “Erase the stigma: Make rehabilitation better fit people with disabilities,” Rehabil. Res. Policy, Educ., vol. 20, no. 4, p. 225, 2006.
T. Hartono, V. Hanami, and F. D. Prameswari, “Drug abuse rehabilitation policies in Indonesia: a comparison with Vietnam, Australia and Portugal,” Wacana Huk., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 163–180, 2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Siti Ngaisah, Wredha Danang Widoyoko, Haryono Haryono, Diah Ayu Rahmawati, Yoga Adi Prayogi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Facebook 
Instagram 
Twitter 
Youtube 
+62 821 1557 5700
westscience.journals@gmail.com