Position and Legal Certainty in the Decision of the Honorary Board of Election Organizers (After the Constitutional Court Decision Number 32/PUU-XIX/2021)

Authors

  • Dedi Supriyadi Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
  • Ende Hasbi Nassaruddin Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
  • Beni Ahmad Saebani Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wsshs.v1i06.445

Keywords:

Dick and Carey Learning Model, Student Skills, Teacher Role

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out the legal regulations regarding legal certainty in the decision of the honorary board of election organizers based on the decision of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 32/PUU-XIX/2021). The method used in this study is the Normative Juridical approach. Juridical-normative research was chosen because it affirms the existence of ethical norms and legal norms as part of the norm system that applies in society. The results of the study concluded that the Urgency of DKPP is a vital and significant institution to deal with violations of the Election Organizer's code of ethics and is a unified function of the Election Organizer; The nature of the legal certainty of the decision of the Election Organizing Honor Board (DKPP) after the Constitutional Court decision Number 32/PUU-XIX/2021 is not recognized and confirms that the DKPP is not a judicial institution, so the DKPP decision is a decision of a State Administration official who can be the object of a lawsuit at the State Administrative Court; and it is necessary to establish an ethical court through law, not only limited to DKPP. where enforcement is carried out through an independent, impartial, and open judicial process, namely the Court of Law for legal matters, and the Court of Ethics for ethical issues.

References

M. I. Nasef, “Studi Kritis Mengenai Kewenangan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu Dalam Mengawal Electoral Integrity Di Indonesia,” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 378–401, 2014.

A. Fadlian, “Pengaruh Putusan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum terhadap Hasil Pemilihan Gubernur Lampung 2014,” FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 777–794, 2016.

E. K. Sari, “Kepastian Hukum Putusan Penyelesaian Sengketa Panitia Pengawas Pemilihan (PANWASLIH) Kabupaten Deliserdang Pada Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Kabupaten Deliserdang Tahun 2018 (Studi Putusan Sengketa Proses Pemilihan Bupati Dan Wakil Bupati Di Bawaslu Kabupaten Deliserdang Tahun 2018),” Jurnal Hukum Al-Hikmah: Media Komunikasi dan Informasi Hukum dan Masyarakat, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 87–112, 2021.

C. E. Y. Kurniawati, “Tinjauan fiqh siyasah terhadap putusan PTUN Nomor 82/G/2020/PTUN-Jkt tentang pembatalan keputusan pemberhentian dengan tidak hormat anggota Komisi Pemilihan Umum ,” Doctoral dissertation, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, 2021.

E. Simanjuntak, “Peran Yurisprudensi dalam Sistem Hukum di Indonesia,” Jurnal Konstitusi, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 83–104, 2019.

M. Y. Yusuf, “KEWENANGAN DEWAN PENGAWAS KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI (KPK) DALAM PEMBERIAN IZIN PENYADAPAN, PENGGELEDAHAN, DAN/ATAU PENYITAAN ,” Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Hasanuddin, 2020.

K. I. Maki, “Kewenangan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu Republik Indonesia Dalam Memutus Pelanggaran Kode Etik,” Lex Administratum, vol. 8, no. 4, 2020.

S. Soekanto, “Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat,” 2007.

P. M. Marzuki and M. S. Sh, Pengantar ilmu hukum. Prenada Media, 2021.

J. Asshiddiqie, Teori dan aliran penafsiran hukum tata negara. Ind Hill-Company, 1997.

M. L. Chakim, “Desain institusional dewan kehormatan penyelenggara pemilu (DKPP) sebagai peradilan etik,” Jurnal Konstitusi, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 393–408, 2014.

Ahmad Siboy and Dewi Cahyandari, “Relasi Putusan DKPP dan PTUN dalam Pelanggaran Kode Etik Penyelenggara Pemilu,” Jurnal Konstitusi, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 638–639, 2022.

J. Asshiddiqie, Peradilan Etik dan Etika Konstitusi: Perspektif Baru tentang Rule of Law and Rule of Ethics & Constitutional Law and Constitutional Ethics (Edisi Revisi). Sinar Grafika, 2022.

S. Luthan, “Dialektika hukum dan moral dalam perspektif filsafat hukum,” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 506–523, 2012.

Yovita A. Mangesti, Moralitas Hukum. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2014.

J. Asshiddiqie, Menegakkan etika penyelenggara pemilu. PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 2013.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-30

How to Cite

Supriyadi, D., Nassaruddin, E. H., & Saebani, B. A. (2023). Position and Legal Certainty in the Decision of the Honorary Board of Election Organizers (After the Constitutional Court Decision Number 32/PUU-XIX/2021) . West Science Social and Humanities Studies, 1(06), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsshs.v1i06.445

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 06 (2023): West Science Social and Humanities Studies

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Dedi Supriyadi, Ende Hasbi Nassaruddin, Beni Ahmad Saebani

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.