Analysis of Business Credit Policy for The Poor in Gianyar Regency

Authors

  • I Putu Dharmanu Yudartha Faculty Social and Political science Udayana University
  • Komang Adi Sastra Wijaya Faculty Social and Political Ccience Udayana University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wsshs.v2i01.535

Keywords:

Policy Analysis, Business Credit Policy, Poor

Abstract

Poverty is a major issue faced by many local governments, including Gianyar District. To empower people experiencing poverty, the Gianyar district government has implemented multiple policies, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. These policies provide business loans for those affected by poverty, aiming to help them get back on their feet. This study focuses on analyzing the business credit policies for people experiencing poverty in Gianyar Regency, using qualitative methods of a descriptive approach. One of the significant findings of this study is that the current policy alternative (status quo) is still relevant for the distribution of people's business credit. This is because its technical feasibility criteria meets the desired outcomes as stated in the regional regulations. However, the policy may not be effective in the long run as it depends on provincial revenues. Therefore, it is recommended to have policy synergy with national banks and Village-Owned Enterprises to provide credit to people experiencing poverty with low interest.

References

S. Safaruddin, F. Fatmawati, B. Burhanuddin, and ..., “Implementasi Kebijakan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan Melalui Program Keluarga Harapan Di Kecamatan Tamalate Kota Makassar,” JPPM J. Public Policy Manajement, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 29–37, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://36.89.54.123/index.php/jppm/article/view/2581

B. K. Gianyar, Kabupaten Gianyar Dalam Angka 2021. BPS Kabupaten Gianyar, 2021.

E. Aristanto, U. Khouroh, and C. S. Ratnaningsih, “Dinamika Kebijakan Program Kredit Usaha Rakyat (KUR) di Indonesia,” J. Manaj. Dan Kewirausahaan, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 85–95, 2020, doi: 10.26905/jmdk.v8i1.4247.

Zefriyenni and I. U. Yuliana, “Kebijakan Pemberian Kredit Terhadap Penetapan Jumlah Kredit (Studi Khasus Pada Ued-Sp Amanah Sejahtera Sungai Buluh Kecamatansingingi Hilirkabupaten Kuantan Singingi Propinsi Riau),” Edik Inform., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 72–80, 2017, doi: 10.22202/ei.2014.v1i1.1443.

A. Aziz and E. Wicaksono, “Analisis Skema Alternatif Kredit Program Untuk Usaha Mikro, Kecil Dan Menengah,” J. Ekon. dan Kebijak. Publik, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 143, 2017, doi: 10.22212/jekp.v7i2.420.

A. Rijali, “Analisis Data Kualitatif [Qualitative Data Analysis],” Alhadharah J. Ilmu Dakwah, vol. 17, no. 33, p. 81, 2019.

A. Amjah, L. Agustino, and A. Arenawati, “Implementasi Kebijakan Pengelolaan Sampah Berdasarkan Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Lebak Nomor 4 Tahun 2018 Tentang Pengelolaan Sampah,” JIPAGS (Journal Indones. Public Adm. Gov. Stud., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 55–60, 2022, doi: 10.31506/jipags.v6i1.12458.

V. W. Sujarweni and L. R. Utami, “Analisis Dampak Pembiayaan Dana Bergulir Kur (Kredit Usaha Rakyat) Terhadap Kinerja UMKM,” J. Bisnis dan Ekon., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 11–24, 2015.

A. C. Fauziah, T. Nur, and R. H. Sampurna, “Pengaruh Implementasi Kebijakan Program Keluarga Harapan Terhadap Efektivitas Penanggulangan Kemiskinan Di Kecamatan Warudoyong Kota Sukabumi,” J. Ilm. Ilmu Adm. Negara, vol. 7, no. `2, pp. 222–235, 2020.

Mualim, “Analisis Kebijakan Penataan Pedagang Kaki Lima (Pkl) Di Simpang Lima Kabupaten Pati,” Dialogue Can. Philos. Assoc., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 35–53, 2010.

A. Rustan, “Evaluasi Kinerja Kebijakan ‘Pro-Growth, Pro-Poor, and Pro-Human Development’ di Provinsi Kalimantan Timur,” J. Borneo Adm., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 100–119, 2012.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-31

How to Cite

Yudartha, I. P. D., & Wijaya, K. A. S. (2024). Analysis of Business Credit Policy for The Poor in Gianyar Regency . West Science Social and Humanities Studies, 2(01), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsshs.v2i01.535