Single-Argument Clause in Bahasa Indonesia

Authors

  • Ida Ayu Putu Aridawati Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional (BRIN)
  • I Wayan Sudiartha Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional (BRIN)
  • Ida Bagus Rai Putra Universitas Udayana
  • Ni Putu N. Widarsini Universitas Udayana
  • I Wayan Teguh Universitas Udayana
  • I Ketut Nama Universitas Udayana
  • I Gede Bagus Wisnu Bayu Temaja IKIP Saraswati

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wsshs.v2i06.872

Keywords:

Clause, Argument, Single Argument, Bahasa Indonesia

Abstract

A previous study was conducted on types of clauses or sentences in Bahasa Indonesia. This study attempted to focus more on the clauses constructed by a single argument in BI. The data were collected from BI speakers, literature, and the researchers' intuition as BI speakers. Data analysis was implemented using a descriptive method. The results found that BI has several clauses, such as intransitive, antipassive, stative, and passive. However, BI owns no non-stative and split transitive clauses. It can be shown that affixes in BI play a significant role in determining types of construction, particularly in the passive. As one of the agglutinative languages, BI shows its property, in which affixed occurred.

References

R. van den Berg, A Grammar of the Muna Language. Dordrecht: Foris Publications Holland, 1989.

S. Brainard, “Ergativity and grammatical relations in Karao,” in Grammatical Relations: A Functionalist Perspective, T. Givon, Ed., Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1997, pp. 85-154.

M. S. Dryer, “Word order,” in Language Typology and Syntactic Description (Second edition ed., Vol. 1: Clause Structure), T. Shopen, Ed., Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 61-131.

R. Ambarita, and Mulyadi, “Relative Clause of Indonesian and Java Language,” Scholars International Journal of Linguistics and Literature, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 85-89, 2019, doi: 10.21276/sijll.2019.2.5.1.

Dharmawati, and Mulyadi, “A Study on Relative Clause in English, Indonesian and Arabic Language: A Comparative Analysis,” Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 358-365, 2021, doi: 10.24256/ideas.v9i1.1804.

F. B. H. Ekaristianto, D. Purnanto, and S. Sumarlam, “Construction of Relative Clause in Indonesian Language,” International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 410-420, 2020, doi: 10.18415/ijmmu.v7i1.1295.

I. G. B. W. B. Temaja, “Intransitive Verb Markers in Balinese,” Jurnal Arbitrer, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 60-66, 2018, doi: 10.25077/ar.5.2.60-66.2018.

S. Chung, “Indonesian Clause Structure from an Austronesian Perspective,” Lingua, vol. 118, no. 10, pp. 1554-1582, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.08.002.

I. N. Udayana, “Effective Sentences in Indonesian,” International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 188-200, 2016.

Afrianto, E. T. S. Sujatna, N. Darmayanti, and F. Ariyani, “Clause and Predicative Constituents in an Austronesian Language: Lampung Language,” Topics in Linguistics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 62-79, 2020, doi: 10.2478/topling-2020-0010.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-29

How to Cite

Aridawati, I. A. P., Sudiartha, I. W., Putra, I. B. R., Widarsini, N. P. N., Teguh, I. W., Nama, I. K., & Bayu Temaja, I. G. B. W. (2024). Single-Argument Clause in Bahasa Indonesia. West Science Social and Humanities Studies, 2(06), 933–936. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsshs.v2i06.872

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 06 (2024): West Science Social and Humanities Studies

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Ida Ayu Putu Aridawati, I Wayan Sudiartha, Ida Bagus Rai Putra, Ni Putu N. Widarsini, I Wayan Teguh, I Ketut Nama, I Gede Bagus Wisnu Bayu Temaja

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.