A Bibliometric Analysis of the Use of Technology in Employee Performance Evaluation: Trends and Implications

Authors

  • Supiati Supiati Universitas Indonesia Timur
  • Ambo Paerah Universitas Indonesia Timur
  • Tirta Yoga Universitas Tribhuwana Tunggadewi
  • Sri Hariani Eko Wulandari Universitas Dinamika

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58812/wsshs.v2i05.877

Keywords:

Technology, Employee Performance, Bibliometric Analysis

Abstract

This bibliometric analysis explores the integration and implications of technology in employee performance evaluations, emphasizing trends over the last few decades. As organizations globally adapt to rapid digital transformations, traditional performance appraisal systems are increasingly replaced with technologically advanced methods including AI, blockchain, and machine learning. This study systematically reviews literature from major scholarly databases to map the evolution of these technologies and their impact on human resource management practices. It identifies significant trends, such as the rise in digital solutions post-COVID-19 and the challenges associated with data privacy and algorithmic bias. The findings offer a comprehensive understanding of how technology reshapes employee performance evaluation, highlighting a transition from conventional methods to dynamic, real-time assessment processes. This research not only documents existing patterns but also pinpoints gaps in current studies, suggesting avenues for future exploration to enhance organizational effectiveness through technology.

References

M. Li, “PSO Algorithm-Based Management Method and Measurement of Enterprise Employee Performance Evaluation,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Integrated Circuits and Communication Systems (ICICACS), IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–7.

U. Prasad, S. Chakravarty, Y. Bisht, A. Prusty, G. Nijhawan, and M. Lourens, “Using Natural Language Processing and Blockchain for Employee Performance Evaluation,” in 2023 3rd International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE), IEEE, 2023, pp. 311–315.

P. S. Prem, “Machine learning in employee performance evaluation: A HRM perspective,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Arch., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1573–1585, 2024.

A. Fitriana, P. T. Nguyen, K. Shankar, S. Abadi, W. Hashim, and A. Maseleno, “Decision support system of employee performance evaluation,” 2019.

W. Budianto and W. Sardjono, “The Implementation of Knowledge Management System (KMS) Evaluation Model in Improving Employee Performance: A Case Study of the State Electricity Company,” ComTech Comput. Math. Eng. Appl., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 35–43, 2022.

T. Tumija and D. Bukit, “Performance Appraisal among Civil Servants through Electronic Performance (E-Performance) at Badan Kepegawaian Daerah (BKD) of Karo Regency, North Sumatera Province,” J. MSDA (Manajemen Sumber Daya Apar., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2023, doi: 10.33701/jmsda.v11i1.3104.

N. I. Jabbouri, R. Siron, I. Zahari, and M. Khalid, “Impact of information technology infrastructure on innovation performance: An empirical study on private universities in Iraq,” Procedia Econ. Financ., vol. 39, pp. 861–869, 2016.

S. N. Pletcher and L. Boehme, “Practical and Ethical Perspectives on AI-Based Employee Performance Evaluation,” OSF Prepr., vol. 8, 2023.

F. C. Lunenburg, “Performance appraisal: Methods and rating errors,” 2012.

S. C. Goh, C. Elliott, and G. Richards, “Performance management in Canadian public organizations: findings of a multi-case study,” Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag., vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 157–174, 2015.

N. Maddah and E. Roghanian, “Data-driven performance management of business units using process mining and DEA: case study of an Iranian chain store,” Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag., vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 550–575, 2023.

B. Johnson and J. Smith, “Towards ethical data-driven software: filling the gaps in ethics research & practice,” in 2021 IEEE/ACM 2nd International Workshop on Ethics in Software Engineering Research and Practice (SEthics), IEEE, 2021, pp. 18–25.

K. Kounetas and P. D. Zervopoulos, “A cross-country evaluation of environmental performance: Is there a convergence-divergence pattern in technology gaps?,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 273, no. 3, pp. 1136–1148, 2019.

T. Zhang, C. Xue, J. Wang, Z. Yun, N. Lin, and S. Han, “A Survey on Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) Testbeds for Connectivity Research,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv2404.17485, 2024.

M. A. Musa, A. Y. Gital, K. M. Ibrahim, H. Chiroma, M. L. Abdulrahman, and I. M. Umar, “A Review of Data-Driven Approaches with Emphasis on Machine Learning Base Intrusion Detection Algorithms,” 2022 5th Inf. Technol. Educ. Dev., pp. 1–8, 2022.

F. Kahfi, “Exploring the Impact of Digital Technology on Employee Adaptation and Organizational Performance,” J. Manag. Adm. Provis., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 37–43, 2022.

R. Byali, “Using Machine Learning Classifiers and A Virtual Voice Assistant for Common Tasks, An Employee Performance Evaluation Model is Used,” J. homepage www. ijrpr. com ISSN, vol. 2582, p. 7421.

M. Q. Huda, R. Irawan, N. Kumaladewi, and M. Y. Koondhar, “Evaluating Social Technology Utilization on Employee Performance Using Positivism Paradigm,” Appl. Inf. Syst. Manag., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 91–96, 2022.

I. M. Jannah and A. D. Nugroho, “The role of communication technology toward employee performance,” INCOME Innov. Econ. Manag., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 30–32, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-29

How to Cite

Supiati, S., Paerah, A., Yoga, T., & Wulandari, S. H. E. (2024). A Bibliometric Analysis of the Use of Technology in Employee Performance Evaluation: Trends and Implications. West Science Social and Humanities Studies, 2(05), 759–768. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsshs.v2i05.877